ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma in situ: A Register-Based Study of Norwegian Women Diagnosed between 1995 and 2018.
Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Van Nuys DCIS Prognostic Index →The Silverstein DCIS Prognostic Index.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased after implementation of mammographic screening. The lesion represents management challenges due to its undetermined growth pattern. We aimed to explore treatment of women aged 48-71 years diagnosed with DCIS between 1995 and 2018, by detection mode and histopathological characteristics. Material and Methods: Data on surgical treatment and radiation therapy (RT) of 4,995 women diagnosed with DCIS were retrieved from the Cancer Registry of Norway. We described the percentage and frequency of breast-conserving treatment (BCT) for participants in BreastScreen Norway (screen-detected) and nonparticipants. We estimated the relative risk (RR) of BCT, using log-binomial regression models. Results: Use of BCT increased from about 40% in 1995 to 85% in 2018. Use of BCT was more common among older than younger women and more commonly used for screen-detected versus tumors detected outside the screening program. Nine out of ten women with tumors ≤10 mm were treated with BCT and two out of ten with tumors >50 mm. RT was given to 89.3% of the women with tumors ≤10 mm, 34.1% of those with tumors classified as van Nuys' grade 1 and <10 mm and 96.0% of the tumors >50 mm. Use of BCT was less common for tumors >50 mm compared to <10 mm (RR adjusted for age, detection mode, van Nuys' grade, and localization: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.19-0.36). Conclusion: BCT was increasingly used among women diagnosed with DCIS in Norway during the period from 1995 to 2018, particularly for screen-detected, small lesions with low van Nuys' grade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.