Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684404›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Long-Term Outcome Analysis and Technical Refinements after Autologous Breast Reconstruction with PAP Flap: What We Have Learnt.

Evi M Morandi, Selina Winkelmann, Petra Pülzl, Angela Augustin, Tanja Wachter, Thomas Bauer, Daniel Egle, Christine Brunner, Dolores Wolfram

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evi M MorandiaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Selina WinkelmannaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Petra PülzlaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Angela AugustinaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Tanja WachteraDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Thomas BaueraDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Daniel EglebDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christine BrunnerbDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Dolores WolframaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap represents a valuable alternative to the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap which, nowadays, is considered the golden standard for autologous breast reconstruction. The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term satisfaction, functional outcomes of the donor site following PAP flap-based breast reconstruction and to present our personal learning experience along with suggestions for technique refinements. Methods: In this prospective single-center appraisal, 18 patients who underwent PAP flap-based breast reconstruction between January 2016 and November 2019 were enrolled. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Breast-Q questionnaire were employed to evaluate the results 12 months postoperative. Data were analyzed with the Q-Score program. Complications were recorded in the medical database and classified with the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: In the questionable time frame, 164 female patients underwent free flap breast reconstruction. Of those, 18 patients that received PAP flaps (9 bilateral) were included in this study. We recorded one flap loss because of venous failure. Most complications concerned the donor site, including hematoma, seroma, and wound healing problems. Patients' satisfaction was high at 12 months post-surgery, despite critical evaluation of the donor site scar. Conclusion: The PAP flap serves as an excellent option for breast reconstruction in patients who do not have abundant abdominal tissue. The overall clinical outcome was good and patients' evaluation showed high satisfaction after 12 months despite high complication rates. Modifications in planning and flap harvesting might improve the donor site outcome and the overall complication rate.

Indexed as

BreastBreast cancerBreast-QBreast reconstructionFlap surgeryFree flapLong-term outcomePAP flapPOSASProfunda artery perforator flapVertical PAP flap

Identifiers

PMID36684404
PMCPMC9851068
OpenAlexW4293088082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.