Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684382›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of diabetes2023

Current scenario of traditional medicines in management of diabetic foot ulcers: A review.

Abhijit S Rayate, Basavraj S Nagoba, Sachin S Mumbre, Hardi B Mavani, Ajay M Gavkare, Advait S Deshpande

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of diabetes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Role of Communication in Managing Chronic Lower Limb Wounds.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Emerging technologies for the management of diabetic foot ulceration: a review.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abhijit S RayateDepartment of Surgery, Maharashtra Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (Medical College), Latur 413531, India.
Basavraj S NagobaDepartment of Microbiology, Maharashtra Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (Medical College), Latur 413531, India. dr_bsnagoba@yahoo.com.
Sachin S MumbreDepartment of Community Medicine, Ashwini Rural Medical College, Solapur 413006, India.
Hardi B MavaniDepartment of Surgery, Maharashtra Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (Medical College), Latur 413531, India.
Ajay M GavkareDepartment of Physiology, Maharashtra Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (Medical College), Latur 413531, India.
Advait S DeshpandeDepartment of Surgery, Maharashtra Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (Medical College), Latur 413531, India.
Dr. V. M. Government Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot infections and diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) cause significant suffering and are often recurring. DFU have three important pathogenic factors, namely, microangiopathy causing local tissue anoxia, neuropathy making the foot prone to injuries from trivial trauma, and local tissue hyperglycaemia favouring infection and delaying the wound healing. DFU have been the leading cause for non-traumatic amputations of part or whole of the limb. Western medicines focus mainly on euglycaemia, antimicrobials, debridement and wound cover with grafts, and off-loading techniques. Advances in euglycaemic control, foot care and footwear, systemic antimicrobial therapy, and overall health care access and delivery, have resulted in an overall decrease in amputations. However, the process of wound care after adequate debridement remains a major cost burden globally, especially in developing nations. This process revolves around two basic concerns regarding control/eradication of local infection and promotion of faster healing in a chronic DFU without recurrence. Wound modulation with various dressings and techniques are often a costly affair. Some aspects of the topical therapy with modern/Western medicines are frequently not addressed. Cost of and compliance to these therapies are important as both the wounds and their treatment are "chronic." Naturally occurring agents/medications from traditional medicine systems have been used frequently in different cultures and nations, though without adequate clinical base/relevance. Traditional Chinese medicine involves restoring yin-yang balance, regulating the 'chi', and promoting local blood circulation. Traditional medicines from India have been emphasizing on 'naturally' available products to control wound infection and promote all the aspects of wound healing. There is one more group of chemicals which are not pharmaceutical agents but can create acidic milieu in the wound to satisfy the above-mentioned basic concerns. Various natural and plant derived products (

Indexed as

Diabetic foot infectionsDiabetic foot ulcersManagementTopical agentsTraditional medicinesWound healing

Identifiers

PMID36684382
PMCPMC9850800
OpenAlexW4313886190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.