Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684360›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Clinical efficacy of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.

Zhihua Wu, Jiahui He, Huantong Cheng, Shaohao Lin, Peng Zhang, De Liang, Xiaobing Jiang, Jianchao Cui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhihua WuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jiahui HeThe First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Huantong ChengDepartment of Spinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shaohao LinThe First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Peng ZhangThe First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
De LiangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaobing JiangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jianchao CuiDepartment of Spinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Local anesthesia (LA) is recommended for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy(PTED), but satisfactory pain management is not mostly achieved. The goal of this study was to examine the clinical efficacy of PTED for lumbar disc herniation when performed under local anaesthetic vs. general anesthesia (GA). Methods: From August 2018 to August 2020, the clinical data of 108 patients treated with PTED were retrospectively evaluated and separated into two groups: LA and GA based on the anesthesia method. General information and clinical outcomes of patients were included. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded before operation, 1 week after operation, and 1 year after operation. In addition, VAS for back pain and leg pain on the second postoperative day were also recorded. Results: We divided the patients into two groups: 72 in LA and 36 in GA. There were no significant differences in gender, age, course of disease, body mass index, surgical segment, duration of operation, intraoperative bleeding, time of fluoroscopy, length of hospital stay, total hospitalization cost reoperation, surgical satisfaction, Macnab satisfaction, complications, preoperative and 1 year postoperatively VAS for back pain and leg pain and ODI, VAS for leg pain on the second day and 1 week postoperatively between the two groups ( Conclusion: Long-term outcomes were similar for both PTED under LA and GA, while GA group had better short-term outcomes, especially in middle-aged and elderly patients.

Indexed as

general anesthesialocal anesthesialumbar disc herniationpain managementpercutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy

Identifiers

PMID36684360
PMCPMC9852754
OpenAlexW4313649487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.