ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Time correlation of success recanalization for endovascular recanalization of medically refractory non-acute intracranial arterial occlusions.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Occlusion Duration in Nonacute Intracranial Large Artery Through High-Resolution Vessel Wall Imaging.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: The management of patients with symptomatic non-acute atherosclerotic intracranial artery occlusion (sNAA-ICAO), which is a special subset with high morbidity and a high probability of recurrent serious ischemic events despite standard medical therapy, has been clinically challenging. A number of small-sample clinical studies have discussed endovascular recanalization for sNAA-ICAO and the lack of a uniform standard of operation time. The purpose of this study was to investigate the time correlation of successful recanalization. Methods: From January 2013 to August 2021, 69 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular recanalization for sNAA-ICAO were analyzed retrospectively in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. The technical success rate, periprocedural complications, and rate of TIA/ischemic stroke during follow-up were evaluated. Results: The overall technical success rate was 73.91% (51/69), and the rate of perioperative complications was 37.68% (26/69). The percentage of patients with perioperative symptoms was 27.53% (19/69). The rate of serious symptomatic perioperative complications was 8.70% (6/69). After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, the effect of the time from the last symptom to operation on successful recanalization was 0.42 (IQR, 0.20, 0.88, Conclusions: Endovascular recanalization for sNAA-ICAO is technically feasible in reasonably selected patients. The perioperative safety is within the acceptable range. Before 51 days, the last symptoms to operation time, for every 10 days of delay, the probability of successful recanalization is reduced by 57%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.