ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Establish a new parameter "horizontal view-axial angle" and explore its role in the treatment of atlantoaxial instability diseases.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study is to establish a new parameter that can be clearly measured on x-ray images to complement the description of the sagittal alignment of the craniocervical junction. The authors anticipate that this new parameter will enhance surgeons' understanding of the sagittal alignment of the craniocervical junction and play a positive role in the guidance of intraoperative reduction and in the evaluation of postoperative outcomes of patients with atlantoaxial instability. Methods: From November 2018 to June 2020, a total of 159 asymptomatic subjects who underwent frontal and lateral cervical x-ray examination in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were included in the study. Age, gender, previous spinal trauma, and disease history of each subject were recorded. After screening, 127 effective samples were finally obtained. When taking lateral cervical radiographs, all subjects placed their neck in a neutral position and looked straight ahead with both eyes. On the obtained lateral x-ray images, a straight line was drawn from the radix to the anterior clinoid process; another line was made along the posterior edge of the C2 vertebral body; and the angle between the two lines was measured, which was defined as the "horizontal view-axial angle." The angle formed by the tangent of the posterior edge of the C2 vertebra and C7 vertebral body is the "C2-C7 angle," which was used to describe the curvature of the lower cervical vertebra. The normal range of horizontal view-axial angle and its relationship with C2-7 angle were evaluated. Results: The average C2-C7 angle of male subjects was (14.0° ± 7.4°), while that of female subjects was (11.09° ± 7.36°). The average horizontal view-axial angle of male subjects was (92.79° ± 4.52°), and that of female subjects was (94.29° ± 4.50°). Pearson correlation test showed that there was a significant negative correlation between horizontal view-axis angle and C2-C7 angle. Conclusions: For patients with atlantoaxial instability diseases, the horizontal view-axis angle is expected to be a sagittal parameter to guide the intraoperative reduction and evaluate postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.