ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Identifying an optimal machine learning model generated circulating biomarker to predict chronic postoperative pain in patients undergoing hepatectomy.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- AI Trustworthiness in the Perioperative Period for Patients with Serious Illness: Scoping Narrative Review.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Dynamic prediction model for early postoperative pain based on generalized estimating equations: a multi-timepoint longitudinal study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Pain and Sleep Biomarkers in Participants Undergoing Orthopedic Surgeries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Observational
- Baseline predictors of responders to auricular point acupressure in chronic low back pain.Clinical traditional medicine and pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after hepatectomy is highly prevalent and challenging to treat. Several risk factors have been unmasked for CPSP after hepatectomy, such as acute postoperative pain. The current secondary analysis of a clinical study sought to extend previous research by investigating more clinical variables and inflammatory biomarkers as risk factors for CPSP after hepatectomy and sifting those strongly related to CPSP to build a reliable machine learning model to predict CPSP occurring. Participants included 91 adults undergoing hepatectomy who was followed 3 months postoperatively. Twenty-four hours after surgery, participants completed numerical rating scale (NRS) grading and blood sample collecting. Three months after surgery, participants also reported whether CPSP occurred through follow-up. The Random Forest and Support Vector Machine models were conducted to predict pain outcomes 3 months after surgery. The results showed that the SVM model had better performance in predicting CPSP which consists of acute postoperative pain (evaluated by NRS) and matrix metalloprotease 3 (MMP3) level. What's more, besides traditional cytokines, several novel inflammatory biomarkers like C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and MMP2 levels were found to be closely related to CPSP and a novel spectrum of inflammatory biomarkers was created. These findings demonstrate that the SVM model consisting of acute postoperative pain and MMP3 level predicts greater chronic pain intensity 3 months after hepatectomy and with this model, intervention administration before CPSP occurs may prevent or minimize CPSP intensity successfully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.