ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022
Comparison of end-to-side versus side-to-side anastomosis in upper limb arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rebuilding vascular access: from the viewpoint of mechanics and materials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: It is currently unclear if the anastomosis technique impacts the patency of upper arm arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in hemodialysis patients. This review compared outcomes of end-to-side and side-to-side anastomosis for AVF fistula in hemodialysis patients. Methods: PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for all types of studies published between 1st January 2000 to 3rd September 2022. Patency rates at 6, 12 months, maturation time, and complications were compared between ETS and STS groups. Results: Sixteen studies including six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in patency rates between ETS and STS group at 6 months (OR: 1.15 95% CI: 0.72, 1.83 Conclusion: Our review demonstrates that the STS anastomosis technique with distal vein ligation may result in significantly better patency rates as compared to the standard ETS technique. Data for complication rates are scarce and varied but without any significant differences between the two techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.