ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Application of the 3D-MRI on post-operative graft assessment in adolescent patients with ACL reconstruction: A minimal 2-year follow-up.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the present study was to assess the prognostic morphological changes of the reconstructed hamstring auto-grafts by using reconstructed three-dimensional MRI (3D-MRI) in adolescent patients with ACLR. Methods: 22 adolescent patients (less than 17 years old) were retrospective included between January 1, 2018, and October 31, 2020, in our department. The patients were divided into 2 subgroups: subgroup A (<14 years old) and subgroup B (≥14 years old). 3D-MRI was used to detect the total cross-sectional area (TCA) and long-to-short axis (LSA) ratio of the reconstructed ACL graft at the proximal, mid-point, and distal regions. The minimal follow-up was 2 years. Results: The averaged follow-up of subgroup A and B was 37.8 ± 5.6 and 37.6 ± 6.5 months, respectively. Comparing to the initial graft (ACLR operation), the TCA of reconstructed ACL was increased by 30.6% on average, and the TCAs at proximal, mid-point, and distal regions were increased by 56.4%, 50.0%, and 17.7%, respectively, inner-group comparisons showed that the TCAs of the 3 region in subgroup A were all increased at the follow-up ( Conclusions: 3D-MRI assessment can exactly identify the morphological changes of the graft in adolescent patients with ACLR, the TCA of the constructed ACL was increased compared to the initial graft, however, the LSA ratio was still lower than the native ACL. Younger adolescent patients may have a better potential on the ligamentization after ACLR than the older adolescent patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.