ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Effect comparison of neuroendoscopic vs. craniotomy in the treatment of adult intracranial arachnoid cyst.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Obstruction caused by suprasellar cisterna arachnoid cyst expansion after ventriculoperitoneal shunt in children with hydrocephalus.Pediatric investigation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Intracranial arachnoid cysts are common, accounting for about 1%-2% of intracranial space-occupying lesions. There is controversy over the method of surgical intervention, and in order to provide guidance for surgical decision making, this study compares the efficacy of craniotomy vs. neuroendoscopic surgery in treating arachnoid cysts. Methods: The adult patients with arachnoid cyst admitted to our department from October 2016 to August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirteen adult patients were recruited, and divided into two groups: neuroendoscopic group (group A) and craniotomy group (group B). We compared the gender, age, clinical symptoms, preoperative and postoperative cyst sizes, symptom improvement, complications, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs between two groups to analyze the therapeutic effects of these two surgical methods. Results: The cost of hospitalization in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (47,292.8 vs. 65,151.8 yuan, Conclusion: Both neuroendoscopic and craniotomy have good curative effects for the treatment of intracranial arachnoid cysts. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between the two surgical techniques. The cost of hospitalization can be reduced with neuroendoscopic surgery. Neuroendoscopic treatment is recommended for large intracranial arachnoid cysts, and craniotomy is suitable for small intracranial arachnoid cysts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.