Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684167›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022

Incidence and factors associated with the recurrence of Rathke's cleft cyst after surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ao Qian, Jing Zhou, Xin Zhang, Jiaojiao Yu, Xiaoshu Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Data-Driven Approach for Rathke's Cleft Cysts Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. The endocrine spectrum of Rathke cleft cysts.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ao QianDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jing ZhouDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jiaojiao YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaoshu WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgroud: Recurrence of Rathke's cleft cyst (RCC) is not uncommon after surgery, and the associated factors and incidence of relapse deserve a systematic summary. Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched until September 12, 2022. Studies with significant results of recurrent factors or specific incidences of RCC recurrence and mean/median follow-up time were included. Based on a protocol of a 2-year interval grouping, included studies were categorized into four groups with follow-up periods  <24 months, 24-48 months, 48-72 months, and ≥72 months, respectively. Quality assessment was performed using the NOS score. Pooled estimations were computed by using a random-effects model in the STATA "metaprop" command. Publication bias was assessed visually through a funnel plot and statistically through Egger's linear regression test and Begg's correlation test. Results: A total of 44 studies were included containing 2,539 cases. Squamous metaplasia was the most commonly reported factor, followed by the extent of cyst removal. The other factors were reported individually. The pooled overall incidences of RCC recurrence after surgery in four groups of the follow-up period were 7.4% (95%CI = 4.1-11.3%) in <24 months, 13.1% (95%CI = 9.7-17.0%) in 24-48 months, 13.7% (95%CI = 7.7-21.0%) in 48-72 months, and 33.8% (95%CI = 19.6-49.6%) in ≥72 months. The pooled symptomatic incidences were 2.3% (95%CI = 0.4-5.1%) in <24 months, 5.6% (95%CI = 3.6-7.9%) in 24-48 months, 5.9% (95%CI = 2.4-10.6%) in 48-72 months, and 14.1% (95%CI = 6.0-24.5%) in ≥72 months. A dramatic increase in recurrent incidence was observed when the follow-up period was more than 72 months in both overall and symptomatic recurrence. A similar trend of recurrence was found in subgroup analyses stratified by publication year, cohort size, and cyst resection strategy. Conclusion: This study systematically reviewed recurrent factors and described the profile of trends in RCC recurrent incidence after surgery with a follow-up time based on a protocol of a 2-year interval, finding a dramatic increase in recurrent rates with a follow-up period of more than 72 months. This encouraged us to put forward a recommendation of at least a 6-year follow-up after surgery for patients with RCC. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021278970.

Indexed as

meta-analysisrathke’s cleft cystrecurrent factorrecurrent incidencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36684167
PMCPMC9849585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.