ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Treatment of avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament tibial insertion by minimally invasive approach in posterior medial knee.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Classification and Bundle-Weaving Fixation for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Fractures: Innovations and Applications of Key Techniques.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- The Minimally Invasive Posterior Approach: A Novel Technique for Shrapnel Removal in the Knee.Case reports in orthopedics · 2025Article
- A novel approach with modified suture bridge fixation technique for posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture in adult.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Arthroscopic Treatment of Combined Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fracture: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- [A comparative study of absorbable screw fixation and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation in treatment of avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament at tibial insertion of knee joint].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study aims to explore the feasibility and clinical effect of posterior minimally invasive treatment of cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture. Methods: Posterior knee minimally invasive approach was used to treat avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tibia in 15 males and 11 females. The length of the incision, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, residual relaxation, and fracture healing time were analyzed to evaluate the curative effect, learning curve, and advantages of the new technology. Neurovascular complications were recorded. During the postoperative follow-up, the International Knee Joint Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm knee joint score, and knee joint range of motion were recorded to evaluate the function. Results: All 26 patients were followed up for 18-24 months, with an average of 24.42 ± 5.00 months. The incision length was 3-6 cm, with an average of 4.04 ± 0.82 cm. The intraoperative blood loss was about 45-60 ml, with an average of 48.85 ± 5.88 ml. The operation time was 39-64 min, with an average of 52.46 ± 7.64 min. The postoperative hospital stay was 2-5 days, with an average of 2.73 ± 0.87 days. All incisions healed grade I without neurovascular injury. All fractures healed well with an average healing time of 9.46 ± 1.33 weeks (range, 8-12 weeks). The Lysholm score of the affected knee was 89-98 (mean, 94.12 ± 2.49) at 12-month follow-up. The IKDC score was 87-95 with an average of 91.85 ± 2.19, and the knee range of motion was 129-148° with an average of 137.08 ± 5.59°. The residual relaxation was 1-3 mm, with an average of 1.46 ± 0.65 mm. Conclusion: This minimally invasive method provides sufficient exposure for internal fixation of PCL tibial avulsion fractures without the surgical complications associated with traditional open surgical methods. The process is safe, less invasive, and does not require a long learning curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.