ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Difference between the blood samples of patients with bone and joint tuberculosis and patients with tuberculosis studied using machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- IFN-γ and IL-6 as Key Predicting Biomarkers for Active TB Among PLWH: Results from Four Machine Learning Methods.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a machine learning model for early pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis using blood test biomarkers.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a chronic infectious disease. Bone and joint TB is a common type of extrapulmonary TB and often occurs secondary to TB infection. In this study, we aimed to find the difference in the blood examination results of patients with bone and joint TB and patients with TB by using machine learning (ML) and establish a diagnostic model to help clinicians better diagnose the disease and allow patients to receive timely treatment. Methods: A total of 1,667 patients were finally enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the training and validation cohorts. The training cohort included 1,268 patients: 158 patients with bone and joint TB and 1,110 patients with TB. The validation cohort included 399 patients: 48 patients with bone and joint TB and 351 patients with TB. We used three ML methods, namely logistic regression, LASSO regression, and random forest, to screen the differential variables, obtained the most representative variables by intersection to construct the prediction model, and verified the performance of the proposed prediction model in the validation group. Results: The results revealed a great difference in the blood examination results of patients with bone and joint TB and those with TB. Infectious markers such as hs-CRP, ESR, WBC, and NEUT were increased in patients with bone and joint TB. Patients with bone and joint TB were found to have higher liver function burden and poorer nutritional status. The factors screened using ML were PDW, LYM, AST/ALT, BUN, and Na, and the nomogram diagnostic model was constructed using these five factors. In the training cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) value of the model was 0.71182, and the C value was 0.712. In the validation cohort, the AUC value of the model was 0.6435779, and the C value was 0.644. Conclusion: We used ML methods to screen out the blood-specific factors-PDW, LYM, AST/ALT, BUN, and Na
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.