Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684110›Full record

ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2023

Understudied factors in drug-coated balloon design and evaluation: A biophysical perspective.

Tarek Shazly, William M Torres, Eric A Secemsky, Vipul C Chitalia, Farouc A Jaffer, Vijaya B Kolachalama

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tarek ShazlyCollege of Engineering & Computing University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA.
William M TorresCollege of Engineering & Computing University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA.
Eric A SecemskySmith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA.
Vipul C ChitaliaDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System Boston Massachusetts USA.
Farouc A JafferCardiovascular Research Center and Cardiology Division Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7980-384X
Vijaya B KolachalamaDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine; Department of Computer Science and Faculty of Computing & Data Sciences Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5312-8644
Boston University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USExponent (United States) · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Coordinating and Bioinformatics Unit for the MMPC/DiaCompU24DK076169 · NIDDK · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI MCINDOE, RICHARD A. · 2006 to 2018
$42.4M
Coordinating Unit for DiaCompU24DK115255 · NIDDK · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI MCINDOE, RICHARD A. · 2017 to 2020
$11.6M
Novel PET/CT and Treatment Strategies to reduce PTS following DVTR01HL137913 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JAFFER, FAROUC AMIN, TAWAKOL, AHMED A · 2017 to 2020
$3.3M
Intravascular NIRF-IVUS imaging of inflammation-guided arterial therapyR01HL150538 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JAFFER, FAROUC AMIN · 2020 to 2023
$2.2M
Mechanisms of drug-coated balloon therapyR01HL159620 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KOLACHALAMA, VIJAYA B. · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
Shared Decision-Making to Improve the Health Status of Patients with Claudication: Developing and Implementing Strategies to Individualize Treatment DecisionsK23HL150290 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SECEMSKY, ERIC ALEXANDER · 2020 to 2024
$851k
Role of intravascular ultrasound in Central Venous Stenosis in ESRD patientsR21DK119740 · NIDDK · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHITALIA, VIPUL C · 2020 to 2021
$503k
PRISTINE: Pre-cancer histology identification of Endobronchial biopsies using deep learningR21CA253498 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BEANE, JENNIFER ELLEN, KOLACHALAMA, VIJAYA B. · 2020 to 2020
$424k
Preventing Post-Thrombotic Syndrome after Deep Vein Thrombosis with Perivascular Anti-Inflammatory Agent DeliveryR41HL160434 · NHLBI · MERCATOR MEDSYSTEMS, INC. · PI JAFFER, FAROUC AMIN, SEWARD, KIRK · 2021 to 2021
$300k
Smartphone image analysis for real time adequacy assessment during kidney biopsyR43DK134273 · NIDDK · NEPHROPATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES · PI KOLACHALAMA, VIJAYA B., SHARMA, SHREE GOPAL · 2022 to 2022
$252k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA253498NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL150290NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137913NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL150538NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL159620NHLBI NIH HHS R41 HL160434NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK119740NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK076169NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK115255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) percutaneous interventional therapy allows for durable reopening of the narrowed lumen via physical tissue expansion and local anti-restenosis drug delivery, providing an alternative to traditional uncoated balloons or a permanent indwelling implant such as a conventional metallic drug-eluting stent. While DCB-based treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been incorporated into clinical guidelines, DCB use has been recently curtailed due to reports that showed evidence of increased mortality risk in patients treated with paclitaxel (PTX)-coated balloons. Given the United States Food and Drug Administration's 2019 consequent warning regarding PTX-eluting DCBs and the subsequent marked reduction in clinical DCB use, there is now a critical need to better understand the compositional and mechanical factors underlying DCB efficacy and safety. Most work to date on DCB refinement has focused on designing both the enabling balloon catheter and alternate coatings composed of various drugs and excipients, followed by device evaluation in preclinical and clinical studies. We contend that improvement in DCB performance will require a better understanding of the biophysical factors operative during and following balloon deployment, and moreover that the elaboration and demonstrated control of these factors are needed to address current concerns with DCB use. This article provides a perspective on the biophysical interactions that govern DCB performance and offers new design strategies for the development of next-generation DCB devices.

Indexed as

arterial diseasedrug‐coated balloonstenosisvascular drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID36684110
PMCPMC9842065
OpenAlexW4283726277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.