ReviewReumatologia2022
The use of orthoses in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. A review of the literature from the last 10 years.
Review in Reumatologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Pregnancy-Related Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.Cureus · 2025Review
- Necessity of collaboration between pain physicians and orthotists in pain medicine.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A review of the literature from the last 10 years quite clearly shows that immobilization of the wrist in the splint (orthosis) is the most effective, initial method of conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The particular advantages of the described method of treatment are: availability, low cost, good patient tolerance, simplicity and minimal incidence of complications.The aim of this study was to try to define the criteria of proceeding with the selection of the type of orthosis and the duration of its use depending on the clinical condition and the patient's expectations. Methods: The PubMed electronic database was searched for appropriately selected studies published between 2012 and 2022. The search strategy used was based on the following keywords: carpal tunnel syndrome, immobilization, orthosis, conservative treatment. The authors also searched the cited literature on relevant research and review papers on potentially relevant topics related to conservative treatment of the CTS. Conclusions: Immobilization in an orthosis gives therapeutic effects in all patients, regardless of the stage of the carpal tunnel syndrome.Most often the orthosis is only used at night for several weeks. During the exacerbation of symptoms, it can also be used during the day during activities that increase symptoms.In practice, it is recommended to wear a splint that immobilizes the wrist in a neutral position or slightly extended at 0-15 degrees (most often 0-5 degrees).A splint immobilizing the wrist and the 2-5 metacarpophalangeal joints are recommended for patients with positive Berger test results.There are no statistically significant differences in the treatment results between individual and traditional orthoses.No statistically significant differences were observed in the treatment effects between rigid and soft orthoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.