Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36683677›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Susceptibility profile of

Swati Sharma, Tuhina Banerjee, Ghanshyam Yadav, Ashok Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multicenter outbreak of plasmid-encodedAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Detection ofMicrobiologyOpen · 2026
    Article
  6. Sulbactam-Durlobactam for Carbapenem-resistantIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Treating Extensively Drug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Comparative genomic insights into carbapenem-resistant versus susceptibleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Clonal lineage and biofilm growth shape cefiderocol activity inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Swati SharmaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Tuhina BanerjeeDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Ghanshyam YadavDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Ashok KumarDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rapid emergence of carbapenem resistant Methods and findings: A total of 356 clinical isolates of Results: Of the total, resistance above 90% was noted against gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftriaxone, cotrimoxazole and piperacillin/tazobactam. By MIC, resistance rates from highest to lowest was seen against imipenem 89.04% (n=317), amikacin 80.33% (n=286), meropenem 79.49% (n=283), doripenem 77.80% (n=277), ampicillin/sulbactam 71.62% (n=255), tigecycline 55.61% (n=198), minocycline 14.04% (n=50), polymyxin B 10.11% (n=36), and colistin 2.52% (n=9). CRAB was 317 (89.04%), 81.46% (n=290) were multidrug resistant and 13.48% (n=48) were extensively drug resistant. All the CRAB isolates harboured Conclusion: Presence of

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter Infectionsbeta-Lactam ResistanceCarbapenemsAmikacinAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesColistinDoripenemHumansImipenemMeropenemMinocyclinePolymyxin BSulbactamAmikacinAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsColistinDoripenemImipenemMeropenemMinocyclinePolymyxin BSulbactamsultamicillinTigecyclineblaNDMendemicmeropenemminocyclinesynergy

Identifiers

PMID36683677
PMCPMC9853021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.