Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36683515›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2023

Multimodality Screening For (Peri)Myocarditis In Newly Diagnosed Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Johan Lim, Hannah A W Walter, Rianne A C M de Bruin-Bon, Myrthe C Jarings, R Nils Planken, Wouter E M Kok, Joost Raaphorst, Yigal M Pinto, Ahmad S Amin, S Matthijs Boekholdt and 1 more

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Systemic sclerosis associated myopathy: how to treat.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johan LimDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hannah A W WalterDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rianne A C M de Bruin-BonDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Myrthe C JaringsDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R Nils PlankenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science - Atherosclerosis & Ischemic Syndromes, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter E M KokDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost RaaphorstDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yigal M PintoDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ahmad S AminDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S Matthijs BoekholdtDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anneke J van der KooiDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM or "myositis") is associated with an approximate 4% mortality, but standardised screening strategies are lacking.

objectiveWe explored a multimodality screening on potentially reversible cardiac involvement -i.e. active (peri)myocarditis -in newly diagnosed IIM.

methodsWe included adult IIM patients from 2017 to 2020. At time of diagnosis, patients underwent cardiac evaluation including laboratory biomarkers, electrocardiography, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Based on 2019 consensus criteria for myocarditis, an adjudication committee made diagnoses of definite, probable, possible or no (peri)myocarditis. We explored diagnostic values of sequentially added diagnostic modalities by Constructing Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis in patients with definite/probable versus no (peri)myocarditis.

resultsWe included 34 IIM patients, in whom diagnoses of definite (six, 18%), probable (two, 6%), possible (11, 32%), or no (peri)myocarditis (15, 44%) were adjudicated. CART-analysis showed high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (cut-off value < 2.3 times the upper limit of normal (xULN)) ruled out (peri)myocarditis with a sensitivity of 88%, while high-sensitivity troponin I (cut-off value > 2.9 xULN for females and > 1.8 xULN for males) ruled in (peri)myocarditis with a specificity of 100%. Applying high-sensitivity cardiac troponins with these cut-off values in a diagnostic algorithm without and with a CMR to the total population of 34 patients demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy for a clear diagnosis of probable/definite or no (peri)myocarditis of 59% and 68%, respectively.

conclusionsA diagnostic algorithm for detection of (peri)myocarditis in adult IIM may consist of sequential testing with high-sensitivity cardiac troponins and CMR.

Indexed as

MyocarditisMyositisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeartHumansMaleTroponin ITroponin Iheart diseasesmuscular diseasesmyositisNeuromuscular diseases

Identifiers

PMID36683515
PMCPMC10041435
OpenAlexW4317542698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read144
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.