ArticleClinical hemorheology and microcirculation2023
Non-invasive evaluation of vascular architecture of focal liver lesions by micro vascular imaging.
Article in Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliable diagnosis of liver focal nodular hyperplasia by a combination of T2 weighted signal and three diffusion magnetic resonance metrics of diffusion-derived 'vessel density', slow diffusion coefficient, and apparent diffusion coefficient: a validation study of two centers' data.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Lower diffusion-derived vessel density (DDVD) measure of liver focal nodular hyperplasia than those of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis allows potential differential diagnosis: quantitative and semi-quantitative analyses of two-center data.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Predictive value of ultrasound assessment of axillary and brachial artery parameters for lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-11-23Compromised Peer Review · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Third Party Involvement · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the value of vascular architecture detected by micro vascular imaging (MVI) in preoperative diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs).
methodsIn this retrospective study, patients with surgery and histopathologically proved or radiologically confirmed FLLs were included. Vascular architecture of FLLs were acquired by color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and MVI on LOGIQ™ E20 ultrasound machine (C1-6 convex array probes). Alder semiquantitative analysis (grade 0-3) and morphologic features of blood vessels (pattern a-f) were used to assess the blood flow within the FLLs. Interobserver agreement for evaluating blood flow of FLLs was analyzed. Using Adler's grading or morphologic patterns as diagnostic criteria for malignant FLLs, the diagnostic efficiency was analyzed and compared.
resultsFrom October 2021 and February 2022, 50 patients diagnosed with 40 malignant FLLs and 10 benign FLLs were finally included. The Kappa value within two observers for evaluating the blood flow of FLLs was 0.78 for MVI and 0.55 for CDFI. According to Alder semiquantitative analysis, more high-level blood flow signals (grade 2-3) were detected by MVI than CDFI (P < 0.05). Based on high-level blood flow signals (grade 2-3) and hypervascular supply patterns (pattern e and f), the diagnostic accuracy for malignant FLLs were 76% and 68% for MVI, 56% and 38% for CDFI, respectively.
conclusionMVI is superior to CDFI in evaluating vascular architecture of FLLs. The high-level flow signals and hypervascular pattern detected by MVI have a useful and complementary value in preoperative non-invasive identification of malignant FLLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.