Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36683287›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2023

The outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with third-line BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Elias J Jabbour, Koji Sasaki, Fadi G Haddad, Ghayas C Issa, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Tapan M Kadia, Nitin Jain, Musa Yilmaz, Courtney D DiNardo, Keyur P Patel and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and the T315IInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Real-world Management of CML: Outcomes and Treatment Patterns.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elias J JabbourDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4465-6119
Koji SasakiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9140-0610
Fadi G HaddadDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9702-8485
Ghayas C IssaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4339-8683
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-2482
Tapan M KadiaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-9832
Nitin JainDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Musa YilmazDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4498-4895
Courtney D DiNardoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9003-0390
Keyur P PatelDepartment of Hematopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Rashmi Kanagal-ShamannaDepartment of Hematopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7829-5249
Richard ChamplinDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Issa F KhouriDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2473-911X
Sara DellasalaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sherry A PierceDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hagop KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1908-3307
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved the outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). After failing second-generation TKI (2G-TKI), the optimal third-line therapy in chronic phase CML (CML-CP) is not well established. We analyzed 354 patients with CML-CP treated with a third-line BCR::ABL1 TKI at our institution, and in the PACE and OPTIC trials, and evaluated the outcome after alternate 2G-TKIs or ponatinib. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to compare outcomes and multivariate analysis to identify variables associated with survival. One hundred seventy-three (49%) patients received 2G-TKIs and 181 (51%) ponatinib. Patients in the ponatinib group had more cardiovascular risk factors (34% versus 19%) and higher disease burden (BCR::ABL1 transcript levels >1%, 165/175 [94%] versus 75/135 [55%]; p < .001) compared with the 2G-TKI group. Among the 173 evaluable patients treated with ponatinib, 89 (52%) achieved 2 + -log reduction of baseline transcripts (20% 2-log reduction and 32% 3 + -log reduction). Among the 128 evaluable patients treated with 2G-TKIs, 44 (34%) achieved 2 + -log reduction of baseline transcripts (13% 2-log reduction and 21% 3 + -log reduction). With a median follow-up of 46 months, the 3-year progression-free survival was 59% (60% before matching) with 2G-TKI and 83% (81% before matching) with ponatinib (p < .001). The 3-year survival was 83% (81% before matching) with 2G-TKI and 87% (89% before matching) with ponatinib (p = .03). By multivariate analysis, third-line therapy with ponatinib was the only independent factor associated with better survival (p = .003). In conclusion, ponatinib is an optimal treatment for patients with CML-CP failing two prior TKIs.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveLeukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-PhaseDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFusion Proteins, bcr-ablHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsFusion Proteins, bcr-ablProtein Kinase InhibitorsTyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36683287
PMCPMC11576052
OpenAlexW4317717496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.