ArticleCancer medicine2023
Classification tree analysis to evaluate the most useful magnetic resonance image type in the differentiation between early and progressed hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimUsing classification tree analysis, we evaluated the most useful magnetic resonance (MR) image type in the differentiation between early and progressed hepatocellular carcinoma (eHCC and pHCC).
methodsWe included pathologically proven 214 HCCs (28 eHCCs and 186 pHCCs) in 144 patients. The signal intensity of HCCs was assessed on in-phase (T1in) and opposed-phase T1-weighted images (T1op), ultrafast T2-weighted images (ufT2WI), fat-saturated T2-weighted images (fsT2WI), diffusion-weighted images (DWI), contrast enhanced T1-weighted images in the arterial phase (AP), portal venous phase (PVP), and the hepatobiliary phase. Fat content and washout were also evaluated. Fisher's exact test was performed to evaluate usefulness for the differentiation. Then, we chose MR images using binary logistic regression analysis and performed classification and regression tree analysis with them. Diagnostic performances of the classification tree were evaluated using a stratified 10-fold cross-validation method.
resultsT1in, ufT2WI, fsT2WI, DWI, AP, PVP, fat content, and washout were all useful for the differentiation (p < 0.05), and AP and T1in were finally chosen for creating classification trees (p < 0.05). AP appeared in the first node in the tree. The area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity for eHCC, and balanced accuracy of the classification tree were 0.83 (95% CI 0.74-0.91), 0.64 (18/28, 95% CI 0.46-0.82), 0.94 (174/186, 95% CI 0.90-0.97), and 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.87), respectively.
conclusionsAP is the most useful MR image type and T1in the second in the differentiation between eHCC and pHCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.