SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023
Endoscopic, endoscopic-assisted and open approaches in the treatment of juvenile angiofibroma: what has been new in the past decade (and 1586 cases)?
Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reactive lymphoid hyperplasia of the eustachian tube orifice presenting with aural fullness: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Recurrent angiofibroma: analysis of risk factors and common sites of recurrence.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeJuvenile angiofibroma (JA) is a benign, but locally invasive tumor of the nasopharynx. Surgical resection of JA is performed through endoscopic (EA), endoscopic-assisted (EAA), or open approaches (OA). The management of these tumors is constantly evolving. We aimed to compare the surgical efficiency and morbidity of EA, EAA, and OA in JA treatment by conducting a systematic review of the literature published over the last 10 years.
methodsA systematic review of the English literature on surgical cases of JA published between 2012 and 2022 was performed. Eligible articles were analyzed for individual patient data (IPD) and aggregate patient data (APD). The primary predictor variable was the surgical approach. The primary outcome variable was recurrence rate.
resultsThe search retrieved 75 articles reporting 1586 JA surgical cases; 129 in IPD, and 1457 in APD data sets. Within the IPD data set, recurrence rates were significantly lower in cases completed by EA than that by OA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrence rates between the EA and EAA groups (p > 0.05). EAA had a lower recurrence rate than that of OA (p < 0.05). For the APD data set, the recurrence rate following EA was significantly lower than that following OA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrence between the EA and EAA groups (p > 0.05), and between the EAA and OA groups (p > 0.05).
conclusionsEA represents the method of choice for mild and moderately advanced JA. EAA and OA still play important roles in the treatment of advanced-stage JA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36683103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.