Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36683099›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

A nationwide population-based study on the clinical and economic burden of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

Marie-Christin Weber, Maximilian Berlet, Christian Stoess, Stefan Reischl, Dirk Wilhelm, Helmut Friess, Philipp-Alexander Neumann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Christin WeberDepartment of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Maximilian BerletDepartment of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Christian StoessDepartment of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Stefan ReischlDepartment of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Dirk WilhelmDepartment of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Helmut FriessDepartment of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Philipp-Alexander NeumannDepartment of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. p-a.neumann@tum.de.
Technical University of Munich · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAnastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most dreaded complications in colorectal surgery. In 2013, the International Classification of Diseases code K91.83 for AL was introduced in Germany, allowing nationwide analysis of AL rates and associated parameters. The aim of this population-based study was to investigate the current incidence, risk factors, mortality, clinical management, and associated costs of AL in colorectal surgery.

methodsA data query was performed based on diagnosis-related group data of all hospital cases of inpatients undergoing colon or sphincter-preserving rectal resections between 2013 and 2018 in Germany.

resultsA total number of 690,690 inpatient cases were included in this study. AL rates were 6.7% for colon resections and 9.2% for rectal resections in 2018. Regarding the treatment of AL, the application of endoluminal vacuum therapy increased during the studied period, while rates of relaparotomy, abdominal vacuum therapy, and terminal enterostomy remained stable. AL was associated with significantly increased in-house mortality (7.11% vs. 20.11% for colon resections and 3.52% vs. 11.33% for rectal resections in 2018) and higher socioeconomic costs (mean hospital reimbursement volume per case: 14,877€ (no AL) vs. 37,521€ (AL) for colon resections and 14,602€ (no AL) vs. 30,606€ (AL) for rectal resections in 2018).

conclusionsDuring the studied time period, AL rates did not decrease, and associated mortality remained at a high level. Our study provides updated population-based data on the clinical and economic burden of AL in Germany. Focused research in the field of AL is still urgently necessary to develop targeted strategies to prevent AL, improve patient care, and decrease socioeconomic costs.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryRectal NeoplasmsAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakColectomyColonFinancial StressHumansRisk FactorsAnastomotic leakageColorectal surgeryPostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID36683099
PMCPMC9868041
OpenAlexW4317712967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.