Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36682996›Full record

ArticleAnnals of emergency medicine2023

Barriers and Best Practices for the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Emergency Medicine.

Michelle P Lin, Sophie Karwoska Kligler, Benjamin W Friedman, Howard Kim, Kristin Rising, Margaret Samuels-Kalow, Stephanie A Eucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient-reported outcome measure use among older adults after emergency department care: A systematic review.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle P LinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. Electronic address: mplin@stanford.edu.
Sophie Karwoska KliglerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Benjamin W FriedmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore, Bronx, NY.
Howard KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Kristin RisingJefferson Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia PA.
Margaret Samuels-KalowDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Stephanie A EuckerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Funding

PROAACT- Admin SupplementK23HL143042 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, MICHELLE P · 2019 to 2023
$1.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL143042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used in clinical trials and have been incorporated into routine clinical care in select specialties but have not been widely implemented in emergency medicine research and clinical care. We describe measurement-related barriers to patient-reported outcome measure use in the emergency department; administrative and practical considerations; implications of developing novel emergency medicine-specific patient-reported outcome measures; and key considerations for the use of patient-reported outcome measures in emergency medicine research and clinical care. Despite the unique barriers of the ED environment, potential solutions include the use of ED-validated patient-reported outcome measures when available; adapting existing short-form, multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures previously validated in diverse populations, ideally using computer-adapted testing; and collecting responses during anticipated wait times. With this work, we aim to inform barriers and best practices to the use of patient-reported outcome measures in emergency medicine research and clinical care to support future, more widespread implementation of patient-reported outcome measures within emergency care. The successful adoption of patient-reported outcome measures for diverse ED patient populations within the unique constraints of the acute care environment may help researchers, clinicians, and policymakers improve the quality and patient-centeredness of acute care.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPatient Reported Outcome Measures

Identifiers

PMID36682996
PMCPMC10293024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.