Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36682349›Full record

ArticleMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2023

Subjective and Objective Assessment of Chewing Performance in Older Adults with Different Dental Occlusion.

Đurđa Nedeljković, Aleksandra Milić Lemić, Jovana Kuzmanović Pfićer, Ivica Stančić, Aleksandra Popovac, Asja Čelebić

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Đurđa NedeljkovićClinic for Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandra Milić LemićClinic for Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jovana Kuzmanović PfićerDepartment of Biomedical Statistics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Ivica StančićClinic for Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandra PopovacClinic for Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Asja ČelebićDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSatisfactory masticatory function is a significant indicator of improved oral health-related quality of life in older adults, either with or without artificial teeth. The purpose of this study was to examine masticatory performance of older adults with different prosthodontic reconstructions and occlusion, as well as to compare subjective and objective assessment of chewing performance. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis study included 100 participants aged 65 and more. The chewing function questionnaire (CFQ) with answers on the Likert scale 0-4 (0 = no difficulties; 4 = maximum difficulties) was used as an indicator of subjective masticatory assessment. The two-color chewing gum test was used as objective assessment of masticatory function (mixing ability), based on the Z-score values. Dental occlusion was assessed using functional teeth units (FTU).

resultsThe results obtained using the CFQ and the clinical mixing ability test are in compliance with each other (r = 0.742). A decrease in the number of natural teeth, especially posterior teeth, progressively reduced chewing ability and increased difficulties in mastication. Participants with less FTUs, or with FTUs that are a part of removable denture, had greater reduction in masticatory function compared to those with FTUs composed of natural teeth or fixed partial dentures.

conclusionThis study revealed a strong positive correlation between the subjective masticatory assessment in older adults using the validated questionnaire and the objective clinical test of the mixing ability of two chewing gums. Our data on influence of the number and the type of FTU on masticatory performance will be valuable when planning prosthodontic therapy.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeToothAgedChewing GumDental OcclusionHumansMasticationSurveys and QuestionnairesChewing GumChewing efficiencyChewing function questionnaireTeeth functional unitsTwo-color gum mixing testType of dentures

Identifiers

PMID36682349
PMCPMC10433093
OpenAlexW4317603112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.