ReviewEnvironment international2023
Simulating patterns of life: More representative time-activity patterns that account for context.
Review in Environment international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A characterization of infants' and children's time-activity patterns for use in soil and dust exposure estimation.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Six principles of exposure science: inspiring solutions that foster healthy environments.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025Article
- Environmental public health research at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A blueprint for exposure science in a connected world.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025Review
- Collection of Time Activity Data to Support Exposure Assessment: Protocol for a Systematic Evidence Map.Evidence-based toxicology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComplex contributions of environment to health are intimately connected to human behavior. Modeling of human behaviors and their influences helps inform important policy decisions related to critical environmental and public health challenges. A typical approach to human behavior modeling involves generating daily schedules based on time-activity patterns of individual humans, simulating 'agents' with these schedules, and interpreting patterns of life that emerge from the simulation to inform a research question. Current behavior modeling, however, rarely incorporates the context that surrounds individuals' truly broad scope of activities and influences on those activities.
objectivesWe describe in detail a range of elements involved in generating time-activity patterns and connect work in the social science field of behavior modeling with applications in exposure science and environmental health. We propose a framework for behavior modeling that takes a systems approach and considers the broad scope of activities and influences required to simulate more representative patterns of life and thus improve modeling that underlies understanding of environmental contributions to health and associated decisions to promote and protect public health.
methodsWe describe an agent-based modeling approach reliant on generating a population's schedules, filtering the schedules, simulating behavior using the schedules, analyzing the emergent patterns, and interrogating results that leverages general empirical information in a systems context to inform fit-for-purpose action. DISCUSSION: We propose a centralized and standardized program to codify behavior information and generate population schedules that researchers can select from to simulate human behavior and holistically characterize human-environment interactions for a variety of public health applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.