ArticleAsian journal of psychiatry2023
Subclinical psychotic symptoms in Indian adults: Application of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).
Article in Asian journal of psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Semantic Processing Deficits and Their Use as Early Biomarkers in Schizophrenia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe study investigated the psychometric properties of the Community, Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE-42), a self-report instrument in Indians.
methodCAPE-42 was translated in Hindi and tested on 312 Indian adults recruited online and through paper-pencil assessment. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to establish the factor structure of the positive, negative and depressive dimensions of CAPE-42: the bifactor model was tested to evaluate whether items converge into a major single factor defining psychotic-proneness in individuals. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted to identify subgroups with a different endorsement of subclinical psychotic symptoms. ,
resultsCAPE-Hindi showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha>0.80). CFA confirmed, a good fit for the bifactor model, factor loading was acceptable for all items in the general factor (Omega-h =0.83) and explained the primary variance of the subscales. Residual variance was explained by the positive, negative and depressive factors (Omega H =0.33, 0.04 and 0.12, respectively). LCA identified three classes traceable, to the three dimensions; a low endorsement group (n = 155; 50 %); a less consistent, group with endorsement on positive and depressive items (n = 117; 38 %), and a high, endorsement group (n = 40;13 %).
conclusionHindi CAPE-42 showed good reliability and factorial validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.