Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36682012›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2023

The COVID-19 Vaccines International Pregnancy Exposure Registry (C-VIPER): Protocol and Methodological Considerations.

Diego F Wyszynski, Mondira Bhattacharya, Oscar Martínez-Pérez, Anthony R Scialli, Melissa Tassinari, Naor Bar-Zeev, Cheryl Renz, Sonia Hernández-Díaz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04705116 (COVID-19 Vaccines International Pregnancy Exposure Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04705116 completednot on this map

COVID-19 Vaccines International Pregnancy Exposure Registry (C-VIPER)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPregistryRan2021 to 2026Enrolled1,184ConditionsCovid19ArmsCOVID-19 vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diego F WyszynskiPregistry, London, Cheshire, UK. diegow@pregistry.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6293-3429
Mondira Bhattacharya, Chicago, IL, USA.
Oscar Martínez-PérezMaternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital of Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Anthony R ScialliReproductive Toxicology Center, A Non-Profit Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1351-4572
Melissa Tassinari, Boston, MA, USA.
Naor Bar-ZeevDepartment of International Health, International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0570-4624
Cheryl Renz, Pregistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7051-1653
Sonia Hernández-DíazDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1458-7642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe advent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to the development of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Prospective evidence regarding safety for pregnant people and their developing fetuses is lacking. The aim of the COVID-19 Vaccines International Pregnancy Exposure Registry (C-VIPER) is to estimate the relative risk of obstetric, neonatal, and infant outcomes by comparing participants vaccinated against COVID-19 during pregnancy to a reference group of people enrolled in the Pregistry International Pregnancy Exposure Registry (PIPER) who remained unvaccinated during pregnancy.

methodsThe C-VIPER and the PIPER are international, non-interventional, real-world cohort studies. Participants receiving a COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy will be matched in the analyses by country and gestational age at enrollment to unvaccinated individuals. Self-enrolled and self-consented participants complete online questionnaires at enrollment, during pregnancy, and for 12 months after the delivery of a live infant. Where possible, outcomes are verified by medical records. The study aims to recruit at least 500 pregnancies for each approved or authorized vaccine and will last for 5 years for each product.

conclusionsBy collecting data for each vaccine brand, the C-VIPER will be able to determine individual safety profiles. The study design allows for analysis of the effects of exposure to COVID-19 vaccines during specific etiologically relevant periods of gestation. Although the sample size may be too small to detect associations with rare outcomes, the study will be used to generate hypotheses for future research. Ultimately, the C-VIPER should provide data that will allow pregnant people and their healthcare providers to make informed decisions about COVID-19 vaccination. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04705116. Registered on 12 January, 2021. EU PAS EUPAS39096. Registered on 20 January, 2021.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36682012
PMCPMC9867833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.