ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2023
Leading change in practice: how "longitudinal prebriefing" nurtures and sustains in situ simulation programs.
Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Moving beyond projects: a logic model evaluation of an established translational simulation program.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Uncovering success stories: how to resuscitate in situ simulation initiatives in Canadian emergency departments.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- 'Everybody's voice is important': using translational simulation as a component of change management.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Readiness planning: how to go beyond "buy-in" to achieve curricular success and front-line performance.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2024Article
- Implementing the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) Tool for Training Medical Faculty.Cureus · 2024Article
- Leaders' experiences of embedding a simulation-based education programme in a teaching hospital: an interview study informed by normalisation process theory.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2024Article
- Translational simulation revisited: an evolving conceptual model for the contribution of simulation to healthcare quality and safety.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2024Article
- Faculty development for translational simulation: a qualitative study of current practice.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2023Article
- Sepsis and Clinical Simulation: What Is New? (and Old).Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Recommendations for embedding simulation in health services.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In situ simulation (ISS) programs deliver patient safety benefits to healthcare systems, however, face many challenges in both implementation and sustainability. Prebriefing is conducted immediately prior to a simulation activity to enhance engagement with the learning activity, but is not sufficient to embed and sustain an ISS program. Longer-term and broader change leadership is required to engage colleagues, secure time and resources, and sustain an in situ simulation program. No framework currently exists to describe this process for ISS programs. This manuscript presents a framework derived from the analysis of three successful ISS program implementations across different hospital systems. We describe eight change leadership steps adapted from Kotter's change management theory, used to sustainably implement the ISS programs analyzed. These steps include the following: (1) identifying goals of key stakeholders, (2) engaging a multi-professional team, (3) creating a shared vision, (4) communicating the vision effectively, (5) energizing participants and enabling program participation, (6) identifying and celebrating early success, (7) closing the loop on early program successes, and (8) embedding simulation in organizational culture and operations. We describe this process as a "longitudinal prebrief," a framework which provides a step-by-step guide to engage colleagues and sustain successful implementation of ISS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.