ArticleBMC medical imaging2023
Prognostic role of pretreatment
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- LDH and glycolytic activity as predictors of immunotherapy response in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Transplant and Nontransplant Salvage Therapy in Pediatric Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: The EuroNet-PHL-R1 Phase 3 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.JAMA oncology · 2025Trial
- Deep learning-based PET/CT mixture-of-experts model for relapse risk stratification in relapsed/refractory classical hodgkin lymphoma: a multicenter study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance of diffuse increased fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe combination of anti-programmed death-1 antibodies and chemotherapy is effective; however, there are no reliable outcome prediction factors. We investigated the prognostic factors based on
methodsThis retrospective study included 31 patients who underwent
resultsCox multivariable analysis indicted that the treatment response based on Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Lugano classification and SUV
conclusionIn R/R cHL patients treated with ICIs and chemotherapy, Lugano classification, SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.