Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36681741›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2023

Usefulness of podcasts to provide public education on prostate cancer genetics.

Stacy Loeb, Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco, Katherine Siu, Nataliya Byrne, Veda N Giri

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06891495 (Feasibility and Validity Assessment of an AI-Generated Health Podcast), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06891495 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Validity Assessment of an AI-Generated Health Podcast: A Pilot Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorQassim UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsPublic Health, Artificial Intelligence, Feasibility StudiesArmsExpert Evaluation of Adapted Questionnaire, AI-Generated Health Podcast Evaluation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stacy LoebDepartment of Urology, New York University, New York, NY, USA. Stacyloeb@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3933-9207
Tatiana Sanchez NolascoDepartment of Urology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Katherine SiuDepartment of Urology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Nataliya ByrneDepartment of Urology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Veda N GiriThe Division of Clinical Cancer Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
New York University · USVeterans Health Administration · USYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

U.S. Department of Defense (United States Department of Defense) W81XWH2010310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPodcasts, or episodic digital audio recordings, represent a novel way to reach large audiences for public education. Genetic evaluation has important implications for prostate cancer (PCa) care but is underutilized. We created a series of five podcasts about PCa genetics and tested their usefulness in raising awareness and providing education to lay audiences.

methodsWe recruited 157 men and women from the general public and 100 patients with PCa from across the U.S., who listened to a podcast and completed an online survey. The primary outcome was the perceived usefulness of the podcast (score ≥5 on a published 7-point Likert scale). Secondary outcomes were relevance to informational needs, satisfaction and ease of use, as well as genetic knowledge and attitudes toward genetic testing after listening to the podcasts.

resultsThe podcasts were associated with high mean scores for perceived usefulness (5.6/7), relevance to informational needs (5.6/7), satisfaction (5.8/7), and ease of use (5.9/7). After listening to the podcasts, 80-100% correctly answered most key knowledge questions about PCa genetics, and 85% had a positive attitude toward genetic testing. On multivariable analysis, the perceived usefulness of the podcasts was higher among Black/Hispanic adults (p = 0.05) and those with a family history of PCa (p = 0.01).

conclusionsA podcast series on PCa genetics was perceived as useful and associated with high rates of knowledge for patients with PCa and the general public. Podcasts represent a promising new educational tool to raise awareness about PCa genetic evaluation, particularly for high-risk groups.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAdultEducational StatusHumansMaleMedical History TakingSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36681741
OpenAlexW4317662910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.