Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36681360›Full record

ArticleBrain, behavior, and immunity2023

Mean affect and affect variability may interact to predict inflammation.

Dusti R Jones, John M Ruiz, Hannah M C Schreier, Matthew A Allison, Burt N Uchino, Michael A Russell, Daniel J Taylor, Timothy W Smith, Joshua M Smyth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain, behavior, and immunity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Depressive symptom instability predicts incident mild cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Moving toward affective immunology: Legacy and future directions.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2024
    Article
  5. Loneliness dynamics and physical health symptomology among midlife adults in daily life.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dusti R JonesThe Pennsylvania State University, USA. Electronic address: dusti.jones@hci.utah.edu.
John M RuizUniversity of Arizona, USA.
Hannah M C SchreierThe Pennsylvania State University, USA.
Matthew A AllisonUniversity of California San Diego, USA.
Burt N UchinoUniversity of Utah, USA.
Michael A RussellThe Pennsylvania State University, USA.
Daniel J TaylorUniversity of Arizona, USA.
Timothy W SmithUniversity of Utah, USA.
Joshua M SmythThe Pennsylvania State University, USA. Electronic address: jms1187@psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Social Vigilance and Atherosclerotic RiskR01HL109340 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS · PI TAYLOR, DANIEL J · 2012 to 2014
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIndividuals with greater affect variability (i.e., moment-to-moment fluctuations possibly reflecting emotional dysregulation) are at risk for greater systemic inflammation, which is associated with cardiovascular disease. Some evidence suggests that affect variability is linked with poorer health indicators only among those with higher average levels of affect, particularly for positive affect (PA), and that associations may be non-linear. The present study sought to examine whether links between both PA and negative affect (NA) variability and inflammation are moderated by average level of affect.

methodsParticipants (N = 300, 50 % female, ages 21-70, 60 % non-Hispanic White, 19 % Hispanic, 15 % non-Hispanic Black) completed a lab assessment and provided a blood sample to measure systemic inflammation (i.e., TNF-α, IL-6, CRP). Affect was collected via a two-day ecological momentary assessment protocol where reports were collected about every 45-min during waking hours. Momentary affect ratings were averaged across both days (i.e., iM), separately for PA and NA, for each participant. Affect variability was calculated as the person-specific SD (i.e., iSD) of affect reports, separately for PA and NA. Linear and quadratic interactions were tested. Models included covariates for sex, race, and body mass index.

resultsThere were significant interactions between NA iM and NA iSD predicting TNF-α (b = 6.54; p < 0.05) and between PA iM and PA iSD predicting IL-6 (b = 0.45; p < 0.05). Specifically, the association between these affect variability indicators and inflammatory markers were suggestive of a positive association among those with higher average affect but a negative association among those with lower average affect. There was no evidence of non-linear associations between affect and inflammation. DISCUSSION: Incorporating interactive effects between affect variability and average affect may be an important consideration in understanding affective-inflammatory associations.

Indexed as

Interleukin-6Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAdultAffectEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansInflammationMaleYoung AdultInterleukin-6Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAffect dynamicsCytokinesEcological momentary assessmentEmotion variabilityInflammationNegative emotionPositive emotion

Identifiers

PMID36681360
PMCPMC10023429
OpenAlexW4317380829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.