ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2023
A fast MR fingerprinting simulator for direct error estimation and sequence optimization.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac MR Fingerprinting at 0.55T Using a Deep Image Prior for Joint TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- A steady-state MR fingerprinting sequence optimization framework applied to the fast 3D quantification of fat fraction and water T1 in the thigh muscles.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Time-resolved MR fingerprinting for TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Efficient pulse sequence design framework for high-dimensional MR fingerprinting scans using systematic error index.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a novel quantitative MR technique that simultaneously provides multiple tissue property maps. When optimizing MRF scans, modeling undersampling errors and field imperfections in cost functions for direct measurement of quantitative errors will make the optimization results more practical and robust. However, optimizing such cost function is computationally expensive and impractical for MRF optimization with tens of thousands of iterations. Here, we introduce a fast MRF simulator to simulate aliased images from actual scan scenarios including undersampling and system imperfections, which substantially reduces computational time and allows for direct error estimation of the quantitative maps and efficient sequence optimization. We evaluate the performance and computational speed of the proposed approach by simulations and in vivo experiments. The simulations from the proposed method closely approximate the signals and MRF maps from in vivo scans, with 158 times shorter processing time than the conventional simulation method using Non-uniform Fourier transform. We also demonstrate the power of applying the fast MRF simulator in MRF sequence optimization. The optimized sequences are validated with in vivo scans to assess the image quality and accuracy. The optimized sequences produce artifact-free T1 and T2 maps in 2D and 3D scans with equivalent mapping accuracy as the human-designed sequence but at shorter scan times. Incorporating the proposed simulator in the MRF optimization framework makes direct estimation of undersampling errors during the optimization process feasible, and provide optimized MRF sequences that are robust against undersampling artifacts and field inhomogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.