Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36681188›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2023

Fusion Gene Detection in Prostate Cancer Samples Enhances the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes from Radical Prostatectomy through Machine Learning in a Multi-Institutional Analysis.

Yan-Ping Yu, Silvia Liu, Bao-Guo Ren, Joel Nelson, David Jarrard, James D Brooks, George Michalopoulos, George Tseng, Jian-Hua Luo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yan-Ping YuDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Silvia LiuDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bao-Guo RenDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Joel NelsonDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
David JarrardDepartment of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin.
James D BrooksDepartment of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
George MichalopoulosDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
George TsengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jian-Hua LuoDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: luoj@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USStanford University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Pittsburgh Liver Research CenterP30DK120531 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Gavin E Arteel · 2019 to 2026
$10.9M
Genome targeting of liver cancerR56CA229262 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LUO, JIANHUA · 2018 to 2019
$705k
NCI NIH HHS R56 CA229262NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK120531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer remains one of the most fatal malignancies in men in the United States. Predicting the course of prostate cancer is challenging given that only a fraction of prostate cancer patients experience cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. This study examined the expressions of 14 fusion genes in 607 prostate cancer samples from the University of Pittsburgh, Stanford University, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The profiling of 14 fusion genes was integrated with Gleason score of the primary prostate cancer and serum prostate-specific antigen level to develop machine-learning models to predict the recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Machine-learning algorithms were developed by analysis of the data from the University of Pittsburgh cohort as a training set using the leave-one-out cross-validation method. These algorithms were then applied to the data set from the combined Stanford/Wisconsin cohort (testing set). The results showed that the addition of fusion gene profiling consistently improved the prediction accuracy rate of prostate cancer recurrence by Gleason score, serum prostate-specific antigen level, or a combination of both. These improvements occurred in both the training and testing cohorts and were corroborated by multiple models.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProstateProstatectomyProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36681188
PMCPMC10123524
OpenAlexW4317708719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.