Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36681151›Full record

ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2023

Ethical Challenges with Multiple Myeloma BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Slot Allocation: A Multi-Institution Experience.

Taxiarchis Kourelis, Radhika Bansal, Jesus Berdeja, David Siegel, Krina Patel, Sham Mailankody, Myo Htut, Nina Shah, Sandy W Wong, Surbhi Sidana and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Navigating Ethical Challenges in CAR-T Treatment.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Taxiarchis KourelisDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: Kourelis.taxiarchis@mayo.edu.
Radhika BansalDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jesus BerdejaSarah Cannon Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
David SiegelDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey.
Krina PatelDepartment of Lymphoma - Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sham MailankodyDepartment of Medicine, Myeloma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY.
Myo HtutDivision of Myeloma, Department of Hematology and Hematopietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Nina ShahDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Sandy W WongDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Surbhi SidanaDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Andrew J CowanDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Melissa AlsinaDepartment of Malignant Hematology, H. L. Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Adam CohenAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sarah A HolsteinDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Leif BergsagelDepartment of Hematology/Oncology,Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Sikander AilawadhiDepartment of Hematology/Oncology,Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Noopur RajeCenter for Multiple Myeloma, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Binod DhakalBMT and Cellular Therapy Program, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Adriana RossiDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Yi LinDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Project 4: Targeting Resistance to T-Cell Directed Therapy in Multiple MyelomaP50CA186781 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Rafael Fonseca · 2015 to 2026
$25.5M
Paul Calabresi Program in Clinical/Translational Research at Mayo ClinicK12CA090628 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WEROHA, SARAVUT · 2001 to 2025
$19.7M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090628NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for patients with triple refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Real-world access to CAR-T therapy remains challenging owing to supply chain limitations impacting manufacturing. The goal of this study was to evaluate the extent of this issue and how major centers are handling the challenges of CAR-T manufacturing slot allocation. MM CAR-T physician leaders at each CAR-T treatment center across the United States were surveyed. We received responses from 17 of 20 centers. A median of 1 slot is allocated per month per center, and the median number of patients per center on the waitlist since the FDA's approval of idecabtagene vicleucel is 20 (range, 5 to 100). As a result, patients remain on the waitlist for a median of 6 months (range, 2 to 8 months) prior to leukapheresis. For patient selection, all centers reported using a committee of experienced CAR-T physicians to ensure consistency. To ensure transparency, 15 centers make selection criteria, selection timelines, and priority scores readily available for CAR-T providers. Centers also reported using ethical values for selection: (1) equal treatment: time spent on waiting list (n = 12); (2) priority to the worst-off: limited therapeutic options (n = 14), MM burden (n = 11), high Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (n = 5); (3) maximize benefit: most likely to complete apheresis (n = 13) or infusion (n = 13) or to achieve response (n = 8); and (4) social value: younger patients (n = 3). Maximizing benefit was considered the most important criterion by 10 centers. This study is the first attempt to evaluate existing issues with CAR-T access for patients with MM and the variability and challenges in patient selection. Integrating ethical resource allocation strategies, similar to those described here, into formal institutional policies would help streamline access to CAR-T therapy and protect the needs of both current and future patients and physicians.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenB-Cell Maturation AntigenHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveT-LymphocytesB-Cell Maturation AntigenReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAccessCAR T cellsMultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID36681151
PMCPMC10040426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.