Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36681087›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2023

Islet autoantibody screening in at-risk adolescents to predict type 1 diabetes until young adulthood: a prospective cohort study.

Mohamed Ghalwash, Vibha Anand, Olivia Lou, Frank Martin, Marian Rewers, Anette-G Ziegler, Jorma Toppari, William A Hagopian, Riitta Veijola, Type 1 Diabetes Intelligence Study Group

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of screening programmes for type 1 diabetes in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Are We Ready With Prevention for Type 1 Diabetes?Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2025
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Insights into Knowledge and Attitudes About Autoantibody Screening from People Affected by Type 1 Diabetes: A Brief Report.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes in Children: A Worthy Challenge?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohamed GhalwashCenter for Computational Health, IBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA; Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Vibha AnandCenter for Computational Health, IBM Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Olivia LouJDRF, New York, NY, USA.
Frank MartinJDRF, New York, NY, USA.
Marian RewersBarbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
Anette-G ZieglerForschergruppe Diabetes and Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany der TU München, Munich, Germany.
Jorma ToppariInstitute of Biomedicine, Research Centre for Integrative Physiology and Pharmacology, and Centre for Population Health Research, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Pediatrics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
William A HagopianPacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Riitta VeijolaDepartment of Pediatrics, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland. Electronic address: riitta.veijola@oulu.fi.
Type 1 Diabetes Intelligence Study Group
Breakthrough T1D · USUniversity of Turku · FIAin Shams University · EGComputational Physics (United States) · USHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEPacific Northwest Diabetes Research Institute · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus DRCP30DK116073 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LORI SUSSEL · 2020 to 2026
$10.8M
Natural History of Pre-Diabetic Autoimmunity (DAISY)R01DK032493 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI REWERS, MARIAN J · 1986 to 2024
$9.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK116073NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK032493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening for islet autoantibodies in children and adolescents identifies individuals who will later develop type 1 diabetes, allowing patient and family education to prevent diabetic ketoacidosis at onset and to enable consideration of preventive therapies. We aimed to assess whether islet autoantibody screening is effective for predicting type 1 diabetes in adolescents aged 10-18 years with an increased risk of developing type 1 diabetes.

methodsData were harmonised from prospective studies from Finland (the Diabetes Prediction and Prevention study), Germany (the BABYDIAB study), and the USA (Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young and the Diabetes Evaluation in Washington study). Autoantibodies against insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase, and insulinoma-associated protein 2 were measured at each follow-up visit. Children who were lost to follow-up or diagnosed with type 1 diabetes before 10 years of age were excluded. Inverse probability censoring weighting was used to include data from remaining participants. Sensitivity and the positive predictive value of these autoantibodies, tested at one or two ages, to predict type 1 diabetes by the age of 18 years were the main outcomes.

findingsOf 20 303 children with an increased type 1 diabetes risk, 8682 were included for the analysis with inverse probability censoring weighting. 1890 were followed up to 18 years of age or developed type 1 diabetes between the ages of 10 years and 18 years, and their median follow-up was 18·3 years (IQR 14·5-20·3). 442 (23·4%) of 1890 adolescents were positive for at least one islet autoantibody, and 262 (13·9%) developed type 1 diabetes. Time from seroconversion to diabetes diagnosis increased by 0·64 years (95% CI 0·34-0·95) for each 1-year increment of diagnosis age (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0·88, 95% CI 0·50-0·97, p=0·0020). The median interval between the last prediagnostic sample and diagnosis was 0·3 years (IQR 0·1-1·3) in the 227 participants who were autoantibody positive and 6·8 years (1·6-9·9) for the 35 who were autoantibody negative. Single screening at the age of 10 years was 90% (95% CI 86-95) sensitive, with a positive predictive value of 66% (60-72) for clinical diabetes. Screening at two ages (10 years and 14 years) increased sensitivity to 93% (95% CI 89-97) but lowered the positive predictive value to 55% (49-60).

interpretationScreening of adolescents at risk for type 1 diabetes only once at 10 years of age for islet autoantibodies was highly effective to detect type 1 diabetes by the age of 18 years, which in turn could enable prevention of diabetic ketoacidosis and participation in secondary prevention trials.

fundingJDRF International.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic KetoacidosisAdolescentAdultAutoantibodiesChildDisease ProgressionHumansProspective StudiesYoung AdultAutoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID36681087
PMCPMC10038928
OpenAlexW4317356385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.