Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36681068›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2023

Social inequalities in access to cancer screening and early detection: A population-based study in the city of São Paulo, Brazil.

Edige Felipe de Sousa Santos, Camila Nascimento Monteiro, Diama Bhadra Vale, Marília Louvison, Moisés Goldbaum, Chester Luiz Galvão Cesar, Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence and social inequalities in the use of cancer screening tests in Campinas, Brazil (ISACamp 2014/15).Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edige Felipe de Sousa SantosFaculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: edige@usp.br.
Camila Nascimento MonteiroHospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Diama Bhadra ValeUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Marília LouvisonFaculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Moisés GoldbaumFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Chester Luiz Galvão CesarFaculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marilisa Berti de Azevedo BarrosUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRHospital Sírio-Libanês · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study monitors trends in access to cancer screening, focusing on mammography, Papanicolaou (Pap smear), and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), assessing the magnitude of inequality in the city of São Paulo from 2003 to 2015 according to education level.

methodThis is a cross-sectional population-based study conducted with data from the 2003, 2008, and 2015 editions of the Health Survey of the City of São Paulo (ISA-Capital). Outcome variables were the proportion of mammography, Papanicolaou (Pap smear), and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) tests according to the protocols. Inequality was measured by education level according to years of study. For static analysis, Poisson regression was used to estimate proportion ratios.

resultsThe proportion of Pap smears remained stationary at a high level (>89%) throughout the study period, while access to mammography and PSA tests significantly increased in the 2003‒2015 period. The present results indicate inequalities in access to cancer screening due to education, and being more expressive for mammography and PSA tests. However, this inequality significantly decreased over the period analyzed comparing the most educated individuals with those with the lowest educational level. In addition, an increase in the proportion of tests performed in the Brazilian Unified Health System was identified, especially for mammography and PSA tests, in the period 2003‒2015.

conclusionsThe inequalities observed in the access to preventive exams were influenced by the level of education. The offer of exams was expanded, more significantly for mammography and PSA, especially among the less educated group.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMammographyMass ScreeningProstate-Specific AntigenSocioeconomic FactorsVaginal SmearsProstate-Specific AntigenBreast neoplasmsEarly detection of cancerMass screeningProstatic neoplasmsSecondary preventionSocioeconomic inequalitiesUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36681068
PMCPMC9868844
OpenAlexW4317470130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.