ArticleAmerican journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists2023
Outcomes in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis utilizing first-line or alternative agents for secondary prophylaxis.
Article in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fluoroquinolones for the Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: Are They Losing Ground?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines recommend ciprofloxacin as a first-line option for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) prophylaxis, citing literature that is over 30 years old. There is insufficient data and guidance for prophylaxis in cases of fluoroquinolone treatment failure or intolerance. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes in patients whose antimicrobial prophylaxis was switched from first-line therapies to an alternative agent versus those who were not switched following recurrent SBP.
methodsThis study was an institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review of patients admitted to University of Kentucky HealthCare from 2014 through 2020. Patients included were 18 years of age or older with a diagnosis of recurrent SBP. The primary outcome examined was SBP recurrence rate following initial prophylaxis failure. Additional analyses targeted secondary outcomes, including 6-month mortality, development of SBP complications, development of an adverse drug reaction, and development of multidrug-resistant pathogens.
resultsFifty-three patients were identified with recurrent SBP and divided into 2 cohorts: 25 patients were switched from their original prophylactic agent while 28 patients continued on the same agent after SBP recurrence. Patients in the switch group had lower rates of recurrence (52% vs 100%). Additionally, these patients had lower 6-month mortality rates (24% vs 57.1%; P = 0.015). Thirteen patients in the no-switch group and 3 patients in the switch group required intensive care on a subsequent admission (46.4% vs 12%; P = 0.008). There were no significant differences between the groups in rates of other SBP complications.
conclusionPatients switched from their original prophylactic agent had lower rates of SBP recurrence with significantly lower 6-month mortality rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.