Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36680728›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2023

Organizing and Leading a Multidisciplinary PICU.

Mohan Ram Mysore, Suchitra Ranjit

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in Pediatric Critical Care.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohan Ram MysorePediatric Critical Care, Boys Town National Research Hospital, 14000 Hospital Rd, Boys Town, NE, 68010, USA. mohan.mysore@boystown.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8723-9724
Suchitra RanjitPediatric ICU, Apollo Children's Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600006, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric critical care units (PICUs) have come a long way over the past four decades. They continue to be clinical areas that are resource-intensive. PICUs require a team of highly engaged and well-trained professionals working together to change the trajectory of critical illness. Consequently, it requires strong physician and nursing leadership to lead the team of dedicated individuals to perform at the highest level. A dyad of a PICU Medical Director and a PICU Nursing Director is a good construct for administrative leadership. Several options of models exist-open versus closed or a hybrid model. A 24 × 7 coverage of the PICU with skilled personnel is important to provide timely care but is not always possible due to personnel constraints. Indian PICUs have also evolved and made significant strides in their governance and coverage models. Policies and standard operating procedures (SOPs) govern the care that is delivered and may need to be updated regularly. The NABH reviews these as part of their accreditation process. A multidisciplinary committee structure to review aspects of PICU function and outcomes on a regular basis is vital. Certain guiding principles should determine the philosophy of the PICU, and the leaders in the PICU need to model behavior in keeping with these principles. PICU outcomes should be measured and tracked; a root-cause analysis should be triggered when appropriate; and interventions should be made using the PDSA (plan-do-study-act) cycle of process improvement when outcomes fall short of expectations. Adverse events should ideally be disclosed, but this represents a challenge in the current environment. Indian PICUs continue to evolve rapidly, and establishing a database for comparative analysis of outcomes is a natural next step.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, PediatricPhysiciansChildCritical IllnessHumansAdministrationHospital managementPediatric critical care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.