ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2023
Detecting atrial fibrillation in the polysomnography-derived electrocardiogram: a software validation study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe present study validated a software-based electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis tool for detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) and risk for AF using polysomnography (PSG)-derived ECG recordings.
methodsThe Stroke Risk Analysis® (SRA®) software was applied to 3-channel ECG tracings from diagnostic PSG performed in enrolled subjects including a subgroup of subjects with previously documented AF. No subjects used positive airway pressure therapy. All ECG recordings were visually analyzed by a blinded cardiologist.
resultsOf subjects enrolled in the study, 93 had previously documented AF and 178 of 186 had an ECG that could be analyzed by either method. In subjects with known history of AF, automated analysis using SRA® classified 47 out of 87 ECG as either manifest AF or showing increased risk for paroxysmal AF (PAF) by SRA® (sensitivity 0.54, specificity 0.86). On visual analysis, 36/87 ECG showed manifest AF and 51/87 showed sinus rhythm. Among the latter subgroup, an increased risk for PAF was ascribed by SRA® in 11 cases (sensitivity 0.22, specificity 0.78) and by expert visual analysis in 5 cases (sensitivity 0.1, specificity 0.90). Among 36/178 ECG with manifest AF on visual analysis, 33 were correctly identified by the SRA® software (sensitivity and specificity 0.92).
conclusionSleep studies provide a valuable source of ECG recordings that can be easily subjected to software-based analysis in order to identify manifest AF and automatically assess the risk of PAF. For optimal evaluability of data, multiple channel ECG tracings are desirable. For assessment of PAF risk, the SRA® analysis probably excels visual analysis, but sensitivity of both methods is low, reflecting that repeated ECG recording remains essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.