Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36680576›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2023

Virtual reality for pain control during shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled study.

Laurens Weynants, Brecht Chys, Pieter D'hulst, Luc Merckx, Jeroen Van Besien, Thomas Tailly

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05183269 nacompletednot on this map

Virtual Reality for Pain Control During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: a Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Study at a Single Institution

TypeinterventionalSponsorAZ Sint-Lucas GentRan2019 to 2021Enrolled166ConditionsStone, Kidney, Stone UreterArmsOncomfort virtual reality monitor (Oncomfort SA, Wavre, Belgium)
NCT06616324 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Reality: An Innovative Approach to Reduce Pain and Anxiety During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled72ConditionsAnxiety, Pain, Virtual Reality, LithotripsyArmsVirtual Reality
NCT07070401 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Use of AR / VR in Patients Presenting to the ED With Renal Colic

TypeinterventionalSponsorCommunity Medical Center, Toms River, NJRan2025 to 2026Enrolled92ConditionsRenal Colic, Kidney Stones, Urolithiasis, HypocitraturiaArmsCommercial AR/VR Headset with Calming App, Pharmacologic Standard of Care Alone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laurens WeynantsDepartment of Urology, AZ Sint-Lucas Ghent, Groenebriel 1, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Weynants.laurens@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-958X
Brecht ChysDepartment of Urology, AZ Sint-Lucas Ghent, Groenebriel 1, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter D'hulstDepartment of Urology, AZ Sint-Lucas Ghent, Groenebriel 1, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Luc MerckxDepartment of Urology, AZ Sint-Lucas Ghent, Groenebriel 1, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jeroen Van BesienDepartment of Urology, AZ Sint-Lucas Ghent, Groenebriel 1, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Thomas TaillyDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
AZ Sint-Lucas · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough external shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is an outpatient procedure generally not requiring anesthesia or sedation, patients may experience pain during the procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a virtual reality device is effective in reducing patient-reported pain during the procedure, consequently leading to exposure to higher energy levels and better clinical outcomes.

methodsInclusion criteria for SWL were according to the latest EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. Patients were randomized 1:1 in two groups (SWL with VR and SWL without VR). The primary outcome of this randomized, controlled study (RCT) was an overall difference in pain levels determined by VAS-scores. Secondary outcomes were differences in comfort levels, determined by Likert-scale scores, clinical success and total delivered energy.

resultsBetween January 2019 and September 2021, we enrolled 166 patients; 84 were randomized to the control arm and 82 to the VR arm. Patients without VR experienced significantly more pain compared to the VR group (mean VAS-score = 4.94 vs 4.01; p = 0.011). The mean total delivered energy was significantly higher in the VR group compared to the control group (55.2 J vs. 48.8 J; p = 0'037). No significant differences in comfort levels and clinical success were found.

conclusionThis study supports the use of VR as a method of pain relief during shock wave lithotripsy. Higher energy levels can be achieved during the treatment while comfort levels remained equal; this however did not lead to improved clinical success. REGISTRATION NUMBER AND NAME OF TRIAL REGISTRY: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05183269. Virtual reality for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective, comparative, randomized study at a single institution. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05183269?term=shock+wave+lithotripsy&cond=virtual+reality&cntry=BE&draw=2&rank=1 .

Indexed as

LithotripsyUrolithiasisVirtual RealityHumansPainPain ManagementExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyPainRandomized controlled studyVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36680576
OpenAlexW4317654000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.