Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36680569›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2023

DBS in tremor with dystonia: VIM, GPi or both? A review of the literature and considerations from a single-center experience.

Davide Paoli, Russell Mills, Una Brechany, Nicola Pavese, Claire Nicholson

Open access · hybridFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Davide Paoli *Clinical Ageing Research Unit, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK.
Russell Mills *Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.
Una BrechanyNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.
Nicola PaveseClinical Ageing Research Unit, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK. nicola.pavese@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6801-6194
Claire NicholsonNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBAarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for dystonia and tremor. However, there is no consensus about the best surgical targeting strategy in patients with concomitant tremor and dystonia. Both the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) and the globus pallidus pars interna (GPi) have been proposed as targets. Few cases using them together in a double-target approach have also been reported.

methodsWe reviewed the literature on this topic, summarizing results of different target choices. Additionally, we retrospectively report a case series of nine patients with sporadic dystonia and severe tremor treated with a double-target strategy at our center. Outcome measures were the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFM) and Eq-5d scale.

resultsIn published studies of patients with dystonia and tremor, VIM-DBS is highly effective on tremor but raise some concerns about dystonia's control, while GPi-DBS is more effective on dystonia but does not always relieve tremor. GPi + VIM-DBS shows good efficacy but is rarely reported and reserved for selected patients. In our patients, the double-target strategy obtained a significant and durable improvement in tremor, dystonia, and quality of life. Additionally, compared with a cohort of patients with tremor treated with VIM-DBS only, significantly lower frequency and intensity of VIM stimulation were required to control tremor.

conclusionOur findings and published evidence seem to support the double-targeting approach as a safe and effective option in selected patients with tremor-dominant dystonia. This strategy appears to provide a more extensive control of either dystonia or tremor and may have a potential for limiting stimulation-related side effects.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationDystoniaDystonic DisordersGlobus PallidusHumansQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTremorDeep brain stimulationDystoniaGlobus pallidumThalamusTremor

Identifiers

PMID36680569
PMCPMC10025201
OpenAlexW4317651692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read96
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.