SynthesisAnatolian journal of cardiology2023
Digital Health Interventions in Patient Management Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature.
Synthesis in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Best evidence summary of digital health interventions for self-management in patients with coronary artery disease.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of Telemedical Interventional Management in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Early-onset atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in young adults: Lifestyle, environmental, and psychosocial risk factors.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs in improving clinical outcomes after PCI: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- Sex differences in ambulatory blood pressure among patients referred for 24-hour monitoring: A retrospective cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- A Narrative Review on In-Hospital Alarm Fatigue and Telemetry Monitoring Failure: Epidemiology and a Safer Telemetry Framework Model Proposal.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Associations between neighborhood socioeconomic status and cardiometabolic health among Asian American residents of New York city.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Impact of an assessment form on promoting in-hospital initiation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in hospitalized patients with heart failure.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Combined Effect of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Homocysteine on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Coronary Heart Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- YouTube as a resource for Parkinson's disease exercise education: an evaluation of video quality and reliability.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Youth on the autism spectrum hospitalized for suicide related thoughts and behaviors: Characteristics and perspectives from the field.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin treatment on ET-1, ADMA, and safety efficacy in elderly patients with coronary heart disease combined with hyperlipidemia.Open life sciences · 2026Article
- PICO-based assessment and categorization of evidence for digital health interventions: an inductive framework development.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Article
- Chronic emotional stress and mediating role of Interleukin-6 in the association with cardiometabolic disorders in a multiethnic middle-aged and older US population.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Cognition and coronary events: A narrative overview of neurocognitive impairment in ACS patients.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Review
- Hypertension and lung cancer in China (2002-2019): A nationwide study of temporal trends, demographic disparities, and independent risk associations.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Can we better prevent cardiovascular disease? 'Stayin' healthy to stay alive'.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Review
- Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Cardiology with Artificial IntelligenceBalkan medical journal · 2025Article
- Cardiac Telerehabilitation After Heart Attack Using E-Learning Platforms and Monitoring Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAcute coronary syndrome patients should be closely followed-up to maintain optimal adherence to medical treatments and to reduce adverse events. Digital health interventions might provide improved outcomes for patient care by providing closer follow- up, compared to standard care. Thus, in this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effect of digital health interventions on follow-up in acute coronary syndrome patients.
methodsWe searched medical databases to obtain all relevant studies comparing digital health interventions with standard care in acute coronary syndrome patients. After reviewing all eligible studies, a meta-analysis was conducted with the remaining 11 randomized controlled studies and 2 non-randomized controlled studies. A modified Jadad scale and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of the publications for randomized controlled studies and non-randomized controlled studies, respectively.
resultsThis meta-analysis consisted of 7657 patients. The all-cause mortality rate was 49% lower in the digital health intervention cases, compared to those who received standard care [relative risk (RR) = 0.51 (0.37; 0.70), P <.01]. There was a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure in the digital health interventions group, compared to the standard care group [mean difference = -5.28 (-9.47; -1.08), P =.01]. The rate of nonadherence to anti-aggregant drugs was 69% lower in the digital health interventions than in the standard care group [RR = 0.31 (0.20; 0.46), P <.01]. Also, nonadherence rates for statin and beta-blockers were lower in the digital health interventions group. The risk of rehospitalization was observed to be 55% less in the digital health interventions patients, compared to the standard care group [RR = 0.45 (0.30; 0.67), P <.01].
conclusionDigital health interventions can be effective in follow-up for secondary prevention in acute coronary syndrome patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.