Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36680294›Full record

SynthesisViruses2023

A Systematic Review of Mathematical Models of Dengue Transmission and Vector Control: 2010-2020.

Samson T Ogunlade, Michael T Meehan, Adeshina I Adekunle, Emma S McBryde

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Vector control strategies for preventing dengue transmission.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. ExploitingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Modeling zoonotic and vector-borne viruses.Current opinion in virology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samson T OgunladeAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3938-3769
Michael T MeehanAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia.
Adeshina I AdekunleAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia.
Emma S McBrydeAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9570-9172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vector control methods are considered effective in averting dengue transmission. However, several factors may modify their impact. Of these controls, chemical methods, in the long run, may increase mosquitoes' resistance to chemicides, thereby decreasing control efficacy. The biological methods, which may be self-sustaining and very effective, could be hampered by seasonality or heatwaves (resulting in, e.g., loss of

Indexed as

AedesDengueWolbachiaAnimalsHumansModels, TheoreticalMosquito Vectorsdenguereviewtransmission modelsvector control

Identifiers

PMID36680294
PMCPMC9862433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.