Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36680035›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Predictors of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Uptake among Health Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study in Ghana.

Abdul-Samed Mohammed, Mubarick Nungbaso Asumah, Bijaya Kumar Padhi, Abhinav Sinha, Issah Mohammed, Safayet Jamil, Osborn Antwi Boasiako, Nladobi Leman, Russell Kabir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abdul-Samed MohammedDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Northern Region, Tamale P.O. Box TL1350, Ghana.
Mubarick Nungbaso AsumahDepartment of Global and International Health, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Northern Region, Tamale P.O. Box TL1350, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-6597-8059
Bijaya Kumar PadhiDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160017, India.
Abhinav SinhaICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar 751023, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7702-3671
Issah MohammedHealth Science Education Department, Faculty of Education, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Northern Region P.O. Box TL1350, Ghana.
Safayet JamilDepartment of Pharmacy, Khwaja Yunus Ali University, Sirajganj 6751, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-2313-4920
Osborn Antwi BoasiakoBanda District Health Directorate, Banda P.O. Box 3, Ghana.
Nladobi LemanBanda Ahenkro Health Centre, Banda P.O. Box 3, Ghana.
Russell KabirSchool of Allied Health, Anglia Ruskin University, Essex, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9257-2775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COV-2 SARs has disproportionately affected low- and middle-income countries such as Ghana, where the healthcare system was not prepared enough to provide care, drugs, and equipment. This study was carried out to assess predictors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among health professionals in the Bono region of Ghana. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 424 health professionals recruited through simple random sampling. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to identify the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance presented as an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). All respondents had heard about the COVID-19 vaccine. The most common source of information was the media (45.8%). The proportion of health professionals who accepted the COVID-19 vaccine was 73.6%. Among those who did not take the vaccine, 64.3% were willing to take it in the future. The key predictors of taking the COVID-19 vaccine included: age 25 to 45 years (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.14-3.35), age older than 45 years (AOR = 5.30, 95% CI: 2.59-10.87), males (AOR = 4.09, 95% CI: 2.34-7.15), Christians (AOR = 3.10, 95% CI: 1.44-7.72), and at least three years of experience (AOR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.033-2.93). Reasons for not taking vaccines included: vaccines were rapidly developed and approved (41.0%), immediate side effects (39.2%), and unforeseen future effects (37.5%). This study showed that most participants had received their first dose of COVID-19 vaccination, and most of those hesitant about the vaccine were willing to receive it in the future. This is a positive finding for policy makers since it reflects that fewer resources will be needed for behavioural change initiatives. In addition, it would present a chance to focus on minority individuals who are unwilling to take the vaccine and offer targeted community mobilisation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Ghanahealthcare workerspandemicvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36680035
PMCPMC9864896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.