ReviewVaccines2023
Cancer Vaccines for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Review in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of the efficacy of cancer vaccines in advanced breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Pooled it
- Computational Design of an mRNA Vaccine Targeting LRP6 for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- HLA class I-specific nucleolin peptides induce therapeutic T cells in triple-negative breast cancer patients.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
- The search for a TNBC vaccine: the guardian vaccine.Cancer biology & therapy · 2025Review
- In silico design of a multi-epitope vaccine against the triple negative breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Neoantigen-Driven Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Emerging Strategies and Clinical Potential.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Recent Advancements in Breast Cancer Therapies and Biomarkers: Mechanisms and Clinical Significance.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Review
- Navigating the Landscape of Cancer From Ancient Times to Modern Challenges: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Modulation of the tumor microenvironment and mechanism of immunotherapy-based drug resistance in breast cancer.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Efficacy of metformin and electrical pulses in breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024Article
- Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Breast Cancer: Cross-Sectional Study in China.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Article
- Article
- Unveiling the Immune Microenvironment's Role in Breast Cancer: A Glimpse into Promising Frontiers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Update on Classic and Novel Approaches in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- The future of cancer immunotherapy: DNA vaccines leading the way.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
- Hypoxia: syndicating triple negative breast cancer against various therapeutic regimens.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the subtype of breast cancer with the poorest outcomes, and is associated with a high risk of relapse and metastasis. The treatment choices for this malignancy have been confined to conventional chemotherapeutic agents, due to a lack of expression of the canonical molecular targets. Immunotherapy has been recently changing the treatment paradigm for many types of tumors, and the approach of evoking active immune responses in the milieu of breast tumors through cancer vaccines has been introduced as one of the most novel immunotherapeutic approaches. Accordingly, a number of vaccines for the treatment or prevention of recurrence have been developed and are currently being studied in TNBC patients, while none have yet received any approvals. To elucidate the efficacy and safety of these vaccines, we performed a systematic review of the available literature on the topic. After searching the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases, a total of 5701 results were obtained, from which 42 clinical studies were eventually included based on the predefined criteria. The overall quality of the included studies was acceptable. However, due to a lack of reporting outcomes of survival or progression in some studies (which were presented as conference abstracts) as well as the heterogeneity of the reported outcomes and study designs, we were not able to carry out a meta-analysis. A total of 32 different vaccines have so far been evaluated in TNBC patients, with the majority belonging to the peptide-based vaccine type. The other vaccines were in the cell or nucleic acid (RNA/DNA)-based categories. Most vaccines proved to be safe with low-grade, local adverse events and could efficiently evoke cellular immune responses; however, most trials were not able to demonstrate significant improvements in clinical indices of efficacy. This is in part due to the limited number of randomized studies, as well as the limited TNBC population of each trial. However, due to the encouraging results of the currently published trials, we anticipate that this strategy could show its potential through larger, phase III randomized studies in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.