Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679936›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Revaccination in Age-Risk Groups with Sputnik V Is Immunologically Effective and Depends on the Initial Neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies Level.

Mikhail A Godkov, Darya A Ogarkova, Vladimir A Gushchin, Denis A Kleymenov, Elena P Mazunina, Evgeniia N Bykonia, Andrei A Pochtovyi, Valeriy V Shustov, Dmitry V Shcheblyakov, Andrey G Komarov and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mikhail A GodkovDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics of N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow 129090, Russia.
Darya A OgarkovaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named after Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 123098, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1152-4120
Vladimir A GushchinFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named after Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 123098, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9397-3762
Denis A KleymenovFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named after Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 123098, Russia.
Elena P MazuninaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named after Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 123098, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0701-5152
Evgeniia N BykoniaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named after Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 123098, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2269-1469
Andrei A PochtovyiFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named after Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 123098, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1107-9351
Valeriy V ShustovDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics of N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow 129090, Russia.
Dmitry V ShcheblyakovFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named after Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 123098, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1289-3411
Andrey G KomarovMoscow Healthcare Department, The Moscow City Government, Moscow 127006, Russia.
Alexander N TsibinMoscow Healthcare Department, The Moscow City Government, Moscow 127006, Russia.
Vladimir I ZlobinFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named after Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 123098, Russia.
Denis Y LogunovFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named after Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 123098, Russia.
Alexander L GintsburgFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named after Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 123098, Russia.
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUGovernment of Russia · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RUResearch Institute of Emergency Care · RUSechenov University · RU

Funding

Moscow City Health Department No. 01-04-530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination against COVID-19 has occurred in Russia for more than two years. According to the Russian official clinical guidelines to maintain tense immunity in the conditions of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to use booster immunization six months after primary vaccination or a previous COVID-19 contraction. It is especially important to ensure the maintenance of protective immunity in the elderly, who are at risk of severe courses of COVID-19. Meanwhile, the immunological effectiveness of the booster doses has not been sufficiently substantiated. To investigate the immunogenicity of Sputnik V within the recommended revaccination regimen and evaluate the effectiveness of booster doses, we conducted this study on 3983 samples obtained from individuals previously vaccinated with Sputnik V in Moscow. We analyzed the level of antibodies in BAU/mL three times: (i) six months after primary immunization immediately before the booster (RV), (ii) 3 weeks after the introduction of the first component of the booster (RV1), and (iii) 3 weeks after the introduction of the second component of the booster (RV2). Six months after the primary vaccination with Sputnik V, 95.5% of patients maintained a positive level of IgG antibodies to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2. The degree of increase in the specific virus-neutralizing antibodies level after revaccination increased with a decrease in their initial level just before the booster dose application. In the group of people with the level of antibodies up to 100 BAU/mL six months after the vaccination, a more than eightfold increase (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon criterion with Bonferroni adjustment) in the level of specific antibodies was observed (Me = 8.84 (IQR: 3.63−30.61)). A significant increase in the IgG level after receiving both the first and the second booster doses occurred at the initial titer level up to 300 BAU/ mL (p < 0.001) in those who did not contract COVID-19 in the past and up to 100 BAU/mL (p < 0.001) in those who were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. A significant increase in the antibody level after the first dose of the booster was noted for people who had up to 500 BAU/mL (p < 0.05), regardless of the previous COVID-19 infection. Thus, revaccination is most effective in individuals with an antibody level below 500 BAU/mL, regardless of the vaccinee age and COVID-19 contraction. For the first time, it has been shown that a single booster dose of the Sputnik vaccine is sufficient to form a protective immunity in most vaccinees regardless of age and preexisting antibody level.

Indexed as

boosterCOVID-19elderly peopleGam-COVID-Vacimmunological effectivenessSputnik lightSputnik Vvaccines

Identifiers

PMID36679936
PMCPMC9861797
OpenAlexW4313472406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.