ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
An Adaptive Sampling Framework for Life Cycle Degradation Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data redundancy and data loss are relevant issues in condition monitoring. Sampling strategies for segment intervals can address these at the source, but do not receive the attention they deserve. Currently, the sampling methods in relevant research lack sufficient adaptability to the condition. In this paper, an adaptive sampling framework of segment intervals is proposed, based on the summary and improvement of existing problems. The framework is implemented to monitor mechanical degradation, and experiments are implemented on simulation data and real datasets. Subsequently, the distributions of the samples collected by different sampling strategies are visually presented through a color map, and five metrics are designed to assess the sampling results. The intuitive and numerical results show the superiority of the proposed method in comparison to existing methods, and the results are closely related to data status and degradation indicators. The smaller the data fluctuation and the more stable the degradation trend, the better the result. Furthermore, the results of the objective physical indicators are obviously better than those of the feature indicators. By addressing existing problems, the proposed framework opens up a new idea of predictive sampling, which significantly improves the degradation monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.