Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679711›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Influence of Channel Selection and Subject's Age on the Performance of the Single Channel EEG-Based Automatic Sleep Staging Algorithms.

Waleed Nazih, Mostafa Shahin, Mohamed I Eldesouki, Beena Ahmed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Waleed NazihCollege of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3153-4251
Mostafa ShahinSchool of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1091-8531
Mohamed I EldesoukiCollege of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Beena AhmedSchool of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1240-6572
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia IF-PSAU-2021/01/18582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electroencephalogram (EEG) signal is a key parameter used to identify the different sleep stages present in an overnight sleep recording. Sleep staging is crucial in the diagnosis of several sleep disorders; however, the manual annotation of the EEG signal is a costly and time-consuming process. Automatic sleep staging algorithms offer a practical and cost-effective alternative to manual sleep staging. However, due to the limited availability of EEG sleep datasets, the reliability of existing sleep staging algorithms is questionable. Furthermore, most reported experimental results have been obtained using adult EEG signals; the effectiveness of these algorithms using pediatric EEGs is unknown. In this paper, we conduct an intensive study of two state-of-the-art single-channel EEG-based sleep staging algorithms, namely DeepSleepNet and AttnSleep, using a recently released large-scale sleep dataset collected from 3984 patients, most of whom are children. The paper studies how the performance of these sleep staging algorithms varies when applied on different EEG channels and across different age groups. Furthermore, all results were analyzed within individual sleep stages to understand how each stage is affected by the choice of EEG channel and the participants' age. The study concluded that the selection of the channel is crucial for the accuracy of the single-channel EEG-based automatic sleep staging methods. For instance, channels O1-M2 and O2-M1 performed consistently worse than other channels for both algorithms and through all age groups. The study also revealed the challenges in the automatic sleep staging of newborns and infants (1-52 weeks).

Indexed as

SleepSleep StagesAdultAlgorithmsChildElectroencephalographyHumansInfant, NewbornReproducibility of Resultsdeep learningEEGelectroencephalogrampediatricsleep stage scoring

Identifiers

PMID36679711
PMCPMC9866121
OpenAlexW4315853058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.