ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Low-Cost CO Sensor Calibration Using One Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient field correction of low-cost particulate matter sensors using machine learning, mixed multiplicative/additive scaling and extended calibration inputs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Based Calibration and Performance Evaluation of Low-Cost Internet of Things Air Quality Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leveraging Temporal Information to Improve Machine Learning-Based Calibration Techniques for Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Machine-Learning-Based Calibration of Temperature Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of cost-effective sensors and the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT) presents the opportunity to monitor urban pollution at a high spatio-temporal resolution. However, these sensors suffer from poor accuracy that can be improved through calibration. In this paper, we propose to use One Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1DCNN) based calibration for low-cost carbon monoxide sensors and benchmark its performance against several Machine Learning (ML) based calibration techniques. We make use of three large data sets collected by research groups around the world from field-deployed low-cost sensors co-located with accurate reference sensors. Our investigation shows that 1DCNN performs consistently across all datasets. Gradient boosting regression, another ML technique that has not been widely explored for gas sensor calibration, also performs reasonably well. For all datasets, the introduction of temperature and relative humidity data improves the calibration accuracy. Cross-sensitivity to other pollutants can be exploited to improve the accuracy further. This suggests that low-cost sensors should be deployed as a suite or an array to measure covariate factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.