Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679622›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Machine Learning Models for the Automatic Detection of Exercise Thresholds in Cardiopulmonary Exercising Tests: From Regression to Generation to Explanation.

Andrea Zignoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea ZignoliDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-5573
University of Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) constitutes a gold standard for the assessment of an individual's cardiovascular fitness. A trend is emerging for the development of new machine-learning techniques applied to the automatic process of CPET data. Some of these focus on the precise task of detecting the exercise thresholds, which represent important physiological parameters. Three are the major challenges tackled by this contribution: (A) regression (i.e., the process of correctly identifying the exercise intensity domains and their crossing points); (B) generation (i.e., the process of artificially creating a CPET data file ex-novo); and (C) explanation (i.e., proving an interpretable explanation about the output of the machine learning model). The following methods were used for each challenge: (A) a convolutional neural network adapted for multi-variable time series; (B) a conditional generative adversarial neural network; and (C) visual explanations and calculations of model decisions have been conducted using cooperative game theory (Shapley's values). The results for the regression, generation, and explanatory techniques for AI-assisted CPET interpretation are presented here in a unique framework for the first time: (A) machine learning techniques reported an expert-level accuracy in the classification of exercise intensity domains; (B) experts are not able to substantially differentiate between a real vs an artificially generated CPET; and (C) Shapley's values can provide an explanation about the choices of the algorithms in terms of ventilatory variables. With the aim to increase their technology-readiness level, all the models discussed in this contribution have been incorporated into a free-to-use Python package called pyoxynet (ver. 12.1). This contribution should therefore be of interest to major players operating in the CPET device market and engineering.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsExercise Testartificial intelligencecardiopulmonary stress testdeep learningexplainable AImachine learningmachine learning interpretability

Identifiers

PMID36679622
PMCPMC9867502
OpenAlexW4315573371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.